Re: [apps-discuss] Non-English reading lists (was: Re: Request to publish draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-02)

Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> Fri, 10 June 2011 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B69311E809D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cqvuONqn4ioI for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-px0-f182.google.com (mail-px0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBA911E80D4 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pxi20 with SMTP id 20so2192569pxi.27 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=0WEp2xMP+WnLkclO0sV8PIPCTQUBjz3pJlUuqxFCosk=; b=S+y/g/ozjCMW6yDO5EVQ+kHOk484VPCxKJYy5rp1lfeNwimPVLhEcW48eCU+yCZdSQ qXv6eEYznn8GvXMF7jffevBFxwtuKjWMXnGc0hC3b5nyvGo7jmtrgjqEXDsj8XwrcIe6 q5tQWN2oyuxpx/UFIgF0ZmXhh7/DbzTfcr4P4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=xZfxtI8Ba0ziPOshk9xIROYT6HMCovXc7w5onaDsYC/Fn+CST4KEaR9iIipXS32xt2 CWrF9BtNHjhI/LWKNKPFKzHtG+9YDaHoyA+X6Edem6I9kaS1opOHLDeNEyokmULl1bAO 4t7o9m9Ja6eZQpBhA8LeH7FqPcgXkkrqftMNA=
Received: by 10.142.208.20 with SMTP id f20mr432616wfg.403.1307733377122; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.143.34.19 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5D92A844AC739C22A4525EAA@PST.JCK.COM>
References: <BANLkTi=WCOORCipkW40gYHzaKUD7cR0CGg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTik-PNUatvfDQGSqtJD0CHLwznCa1A@mail.gmail.com> <5D92A844AC739C22A4525EAA@PST.JCK.COM>
From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:15:57 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTikHMfB8DWzKV=xhwi_JXkZjQ6E0XA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Non-English reading lists (was: Re: Request to publish draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-02)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:16:38 -0000

On 10 June 2011 16:05, John C Klensin wrote:

> A big problem, especially for a BCP or standards-track document,
> is the question of evaluation of the references.

Yes, and actually I could not evaluate anything in your
reading list, because I won't buy books just because
they are mentioned in an I-D I care about, and I'm no
member of any library at the moment.  In essence the
same problem why I don't like ISO standards unless I
find a free online version at ECMA or elsewhere.

> If you want to gather up some people who could do
> (and that includes cross-checking and evaluating)
> a reading list in one or more languages (I'd
> recommend doing it in annotated bibliography form)
[...]

Well, no, we discussed the one and only German book
I could contribute to this BCP offlist, and agreed
that adding it does not really help with the issue.

But your I-D still asks for a general solution, and
my proposal would be "RFC fan pages", e.g., a Wiki
based on MediaWiki (but not another Wiki software)
with a page for each RFC, and a "talk" page for the
community.  Or something in this direction cooked
up by the IETF tools folks.  Whatever the solution
is, it should somehow integrate the errata process,
and offer pointers to related RFC xxxx-bis mailing
lists.

<dreaming> In an ideal world I could grab the last
SMTP and message format XML versions, fix the known
errata, and send them to the authors for publication
as STD.  Unless the IETF already committed two step
suicide... ;-) </dreaming>

Cheers