Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-03
Franck Martin <franck@peachymango.org> Fri, 17 May 2013 01:47 UTC
Return-Path: <franck@peachymango.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C3821F8E3C for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 18:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q4R8Zod8VBDK for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 18:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.01.com (smtp.01.com [199.36.142.181]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A781021F8D00 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 18:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-1.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2DDF294149 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 20:47:36 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp-out-1.01.com
Received: from smtp.01.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out-1.01.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ySIziMpKeJnq for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 20:47:36 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail-2.01.com (mail.01.com [172.18.30.178]) by smtp-out-1.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C83294059 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 20:47:36 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 20:47:35 -0500
From: Franck Martin <franck@peachymango.org>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <566479399.228274.1368755255546.JavaMail.root@peachymango.org>
In-Reply-To: <WM!bfe1c6e9f2cec463d88767774705f9aef8a6e50e314f1208c41151b23f2f505efe6cba8b632fd037a0024672a98771a4!@asav-2.01.com>
References: <01OTO93GD6L2000054@mauve.mrochek.com> <20130515202613.24981.qmail@joyce.lan> <01OTOENRSJ6Q000054@mauve.mrochek.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305152133120.63512@joyce.lan> <WM!bfe1c6e9f2cec463d88767774705f9aef8a6e50e314f1208c41151b23f2f505efe6cba8b632fd037a0024672a98771a4!@asav-2.01.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [69.28.149.29]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.3_GA_5664 (ZimbraWebClient - FF20 (Mac)/8.0.3_GA_5664)
Thread-Topic: Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-03
Thread-Index: zOUS++4Ml4McRucgzukMth1q/b02Pw==
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-03
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 01:47:48 -0000
8.1.5. Unbalanced Quotes Not sure I agree with that, we should avoid to place a domain name in the display part. should be interpreted as: To: "Joe" <joe@example.com> 8.5. Header Field Counts I see option 1 at the MTA level option 2 at the MSA for an MUA, it has to deal with an invalid message, I think 3 could apply, but then the MUA only renders the message why should it alter it, especially if the message will be rendered by different MUA. 8.6. Missing Header Fields I see it differently... If the email comes from a MSA then add the fields, if the email comes from another MTA, reject the email.
- [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-malf… Dave Crocker
- [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-malf… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… John Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… John Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… John R Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… Franck Martin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… John R Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… John R Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-… Murray S. Kucherawy
- [apps-discuss] Malformed mail (was Re: Review of:… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Malformed mail (was Re: Review… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Malformed mail (was Re: Review… John Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] Malformed mail (was Re: Review… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Malformed mail (was Re: Review… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Malformed mail (was Re: Review… Ned Freed