Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02.txt

SM <sm@resistor.net> Fri, 09 December 2011 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A5F21F87E2 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:01:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fDBBw4Rcl63Y for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:01:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE4821F86EC for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:01:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.4/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pB9J154O017394 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:01:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1323457272; bh=KwtBAow7+SrrNVrxcJQijkg+n11Gohq9ttVsbiM0Gd8=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=bmCO1oQU65pxhDVNRUdOwJouSUJp5TTslOQnQq86Zsrzi9EZNiRTudquiBgyqjzgg wasZ1rB21/jSCjqy6VFXn8isV7Vlc1uiLzmeYBnNWCteHTg3P4naXIaCneu2HgfIL8 ISB3lsavtahFp0LnVtmP8H/43Ki9oE16Wl/DtM1A=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1323457272; bh=KwtBAow7+SrrNVrxcJQijkg+n11Gohq9ttVsbiM0Gd8=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=Bxer319/YWT0i33GiTxGj7AEdtXX29ULlXmIJuAe4jKRPugNFSGBVMnwkNczt/MTJ OMRbQsoESAoh48WLlyvj5ftNANmK9rAkXuYtVLIwpzber4by+sVa8RPM8rzCjfbRNo Qk1rlC2b3NX7pFiXm2udfQKhZhGBzQfPAPOxU5Y8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20111209093855.0aa4fed0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:54:43 -0800
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4EE2430E.4080501@isode.com>
References: <4EE2430E.4080501@isode.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:01:23 -0000

At 09:19 09-12-2011, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>I would like to initiate WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02.txt. 
>Due to holiday season the WGLC is going to be a long one and will 
>end on January 6th. Please send any comments

Please consider the comments below as nits.

In Section 1:

   "Therefore this document deprecates the "X-" convention for most
    application protocols and makes specific recommendations about
    how to proceed in a world without the distinction between
    standard and non-standard parameters."

In Section 2, there is a "MUST NOT" for implementers of application 
protocols.  The "most" (see quoted text) is not taken into 
consideration.  The authors could get away with a "SHOULD" instead of a "MUST".

Regards,
-sm