IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] merge-patch: more examples

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 30 May 2013 09:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EB421F9825 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 May 2013 02:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.08
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.481, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tPcitqfVYSIc for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 May 2013 02:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF83621F9815 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 May 2013 02:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.80] (unknown [118.209.184.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E04F22E253; Thu, 30 May 2013 05:07:34 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CABP7RbfKpSE0cLP+jz6L-JD4wPncm7Qi3cn2CzFHhSuXDRTFUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 19:07:30 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <91AEBA22-6335-475D-A1A5-E1FC5575CD63@mnot.net>
References: <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E1151A6C8594@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> <CABP7Rbd_wbJfCJkK-RneiYkO62r_zSpKEMoVkyy0518mX3pn_Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABL+ZB61K65_s8YspBSHK+mTs4gtSW6Gir4j7YLHWS-EFABaHg@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbfKpSE0cLP+jz6L-JD4wPncm7Qi3cn2CzFHhSuXDRTFUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] merge-patch: more examples
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 09:07:46 -0000

Whatever makes sense; do you want a new repo under json-patch, or...?

Cheers,

On 22/05/2013, at 2:14 AM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:

> Agreed. The example test cases in the spec are intended to help
> bootstrap such an effort. If you'd like to get a repo set up, or,
> perhaps, if Mark would be willing to let us expand the existing repo
> to deal with merge-patch tests, I'll contribute whatever test casesI
> can.
> 
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com> wrote:
>> It might also be nice to make an analogue to
>> https://github.com/json-patch/json-patch-tests
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status