Re: [apps-discuss] "X-" revisited

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 27 June 2011 23:16 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98EA9E8005 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.759
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.759 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.440, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6q1NwV1yUYve for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D2C1F0C42 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 74736 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2011 23:16:45 -0000
Received: from gal.iecc.com (64.57.183.53) by mail2.iecc.com with SMTP; 27 Jun 2011 23:16:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 6857 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2011 23:16:45 -0000
Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 27 Jun 2011 23:16:45 -0000
Date: 27 Jun 2011 23:16:23 -0000
Message-ID: <20110627231623.17098.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <4E08F623.2030803@dcrocker.net>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] "X-" revisited
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:16:47 -0000

>What motivates the current document is that 'safe haven' turns out not to be 
>nearly as important as making it easier to take the private efforts that have 
>become popular and make then standardized, with the minimum transition pain.

Perhaps some advice beyond not using X- would be helpful.

Something like use a descriptive name, and longer (within reason) is
better than shorter to avoid collisions.

R's,
John