[apps-discuss] Status of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-04

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Mon, 20 May 2013 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF47F21F9678 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.366
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.366 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.233, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IfEuOo52lkPM for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3754821F8F41 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.130.208]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4KKtviB026930 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 20 May 2013 13:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1369083369; bh=eeqmHgKwuE80GiYI3gPeF9QFS4AGQgfsiIgbWDl5jTA=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=N1yxS9y1JHsjLcFEa+l3OjQZKHspg24MAdVg9Nhq3njWV0OD2s5uGrKLS3kesro1d 6zUMwjtEh3MSBwuYB/PdMuulMcNE7RiihvKwRGFbnFwqZ1XzsFcA6YrUWgMwH9hT+Z 9PlAb/jONeNkyCYhe0VXXrRE2JVObLaVzS52Z7kE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1369083369; i=@elandsys.com; bh=eeqmHgKwuE80GiYI3gPeF9QFS4AGQgfsiIgbWDl5jTA=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=D6m6fgIX6zrNf/vq2ALvzUqKjB2/shf3cK0QvaKpfBe+vASqn+iTEChdB95381Ef9 +ZcNH9Z/FhiheFH/aWKZvRRtxZYJmT3yPYgywpsIyo71/wC/hLGmqHoUBtcM3cpMvG sQDQ0egsiRrP8Y/Kk7vtdg/kRt54YwgADrYAajh8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130520131213.0bebc4e8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 13:44:28 -0700
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] Status of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-04
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 20:56:22 -0000

Hi Murray,

I reviewed draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-04.  The document is ready 
for publication as an Internet Standard.

I'll list nits below.

In Section 1:

   "DomainKeys Identified Mail Signatures ([DKIM])>"

There is an errant ">" in there.

   "This proposal is not intended to be restricted to domain-based"

I leave it to you to see whether you prefer to use "document" instead 
of "proposal".

In Appendix C.2:

   "Authentication-Results: example.org/1; none"

There is an errant slash.

In Appendix C.7:

   "Authentication-Results: foo.example.net (foo) / (bar) 1 (baz);"

Is that correct?

I'll consider all the last WGLC comments as addressed unless someone 
says otherwise.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy (as document shepherd)