Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Mon, 31 January 2011 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7811B3A6C54 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:28:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.594
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.594 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sHYpfN5zsr+V for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:28:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879743A6C3F for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:28:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] ((unknown) [109.73.6.25]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <TUcOJgADL1Je@rufus.isode.com>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:31:51 +0000
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: NORDNS
Message-ID: <4D470E07.6000300@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:31:19 +0300
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
References: %3C4D26B005.2060909@gmail.com%3E <4D2C7755.5080908@gmail.com> <81F42F63D5BB344ABF294F8E80990C7902782BBA@MTV-EXCHANGE.microfocus.com> <4D455380.6040103@gmail.com> <3792F8F3-D01B-4B05-9E73-59228F09FE5C@gbiv.com> <4D464EA4.7090303@gmail.com> <7ED44745-7DBA-4372-BE39-22061DC26DF2@gbiv.com> <4D46CE52.6030503@vpnc.org> <4D46D118.6000403@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4D46D118.6000403@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:28:38 -0000

Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 31.01.2011 15:59, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
>> ...
>> Mykyta, you are approximately the only person who seems to have a
>> problem understanding that standards organizations like the IETF
>> sometimes don't follow through on what they thought were good ideas and
>> sometimes don't document that. Your response is to generate many useless
>> efforts to clean up the IETF specs instead of just doing what everyone
>> else does, which is to ask a question, find the answer, and move on. It
>> feels like you are wasting lots of people's time for the benefit of no
>> one other than maybe yourself. (If there are others who feel that
>> Mykyta's efforts are worth our time, by all means speak up and I'm happy
>> to back down here.)
>> ...
>
> +1
>
> Speaking of which: there are URI schemes that *are* in use and should 
> be registered (independently how "bad" we think they are); candidates 
> are "itms" and "ical", which will probably require collaboration from 
> Apple.

As well as imaps:, pops: and possibly even smtp: