IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Patch

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 23 November 2011 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F9111E80A5 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:37:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.984
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.984 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.385, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80RMS1dU8D2T for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:37:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CBA3411E80A3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:37:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2011 17:37:40 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 23 Nov 2011 18:37:40 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+4OFdSkxm4MOYwNc3ra0vYDjXguxJJEazMNEPg0m FVdo1nyGmXlEYM
Message-ID: <4ECD2F60.5080902@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:37:36 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Paul C. Bryan" <paul.bryan@forgerock.com>
References: <4EB1482E.1040600@adobe.com> <4EB14C2E.8040208@gmx.de> <1320254564.2622.37.camel@neutron> <4EBBA0DD.9020605@gmx.de> <4ECBC843.60900@gmx.de> <1321986297.2091.1.camel@neutron> <4ECCE93C.406@gmx.de> <1322068744.6133.1.camel@neutron>
In-Reply-To: <1322068744.6133.1.camel@neutron>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Patch
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:37:44 -0000

On 2011-11-23 18:19, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
> I'm now inclined to simply make "to" a JSON pointer as well.
> Semantically it's clear, It's easy to apply, and JSON diff
> implementations can be smart if they want and notice something moved
> from one node in the graph to another.

+1, except that I'm not convinced that leaving this optional is a good 
idea...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email