IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] RFC 1738 is made obsolete by what?

t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Thu, 26 May 2016 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953E612D74F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2016 09:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HJpixvmtgr4W for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2016 09:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1on0739.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe00::739]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FFC912D70E for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2016 09:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-btconnect-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=8kFFKom8bbHe2K/hOOLTAA+oqwlwUCPQwjepRlHKC6o=; b=FFKMSWyJrmRnIOPmSZ3SeUNQq3+o9K+CbEdxOO8YaMtBx/Y5ysUWTdQEaD4DQdmmHNeqj8MgmaIiXd8cAlYjUSQCBAy3R7admG8uzUaI8qCOMLJXzFlTk1JuVY+DqNDd8xWPN4alsMPrnyWxbXZNUe+4ezznKRnsH/RRs4EtxpE=
Authentication-Results: kerwin.net.au; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;kerwin.net.au; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com;
Received: from pc6 (109.145.193.232) by DB5PR07MB1622.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.166.12.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.501.7; Thu, 26 May 2016 16:22:53 +0000
Message-ID: <02f701d1b76a$4bb62660$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
References: <em4eddc16c-e509-4839-8934-dd743f351469@helsinki> <CACweHNAfW+KR4_jaYrzr4aTXhCg-NZgqpDW8e36cZ8TTCp=QUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 17:18:45 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [109.145.193.232]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DB5PR03CA0051.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.164.34.19) To DB5PR07MB1622.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.166.12.149)
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: bff82420-acdd-4bca-10fa-08d38581fd39
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; DB5PR07MB1622; 2:fx6fSAS10DO5nLlk7CylrTpXmZfsemhQTWcmPTXm3aHN4eF5YQiUgh6JMMmDYkngmYCOgypypo6uzD3FsHf0Pot0moSP8d9WtPHvJdoAlefR5AjyUGam7QcTKN7aG2+HYpO+yIlQnjC00Aod3NurJG56ygh9fwXLkUz+NHov6OdEp+GCRhQY18OBa+h6P1BP; 3:XQtZfpz7QL1uQpixWzd1Q5RFp8njjidIFqNkcqTQY2LPSC4Jq2bC2pGg2ZsrOGB/uaG/cPFTFrwFl+8eAIsKeWOKyllLYYtNJfhIH6OV/APKx5ibORzRARcts1/9q5Bq; 25:6kEUmNfDc7s6h3Ap2lGKX1V/Ni0AvwRsWRV4Vt95FuLkcbKiQ0jX4SBfvmozAXeCGfci/rL9kOdlQNGqiYRqCkNwec+4U15//TUzXtFafdNUNbTLAYqMwRVC4jBuoiMEzhm9tD9Yya6nKUVCPELgwF8S5B8vlocafEuMWrrq/FAk4cwxhJFayRUFPEm+YJwS5SSKB1wSFcwTqE/wT6gpI2V5R+gQCehG68+UpgQSXTJIjl5FF730NuVnEEBCwMWolh2U0qDCcn7tKuoJx6063OP9ls2CCbtyxn/n+OkTKo0BSrtnbAt0CncKcNg4jClW9g3de5uSXX4Yg9CxiUYQVo8W6/6Ifr085fUDuqjt32To8FI4svRjGZyeqoMSIroKxrPnF6rYZsW4imHntPtzZYsMFwCLRPBNsBpr+x4DCcg=
X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB5PR07MB1622;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <DB5PR07MB16225350F5D00E279E178430A0410@DB5PR07MB1622.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:DB5PR07MB1622; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB5PR07MB1622;
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; DB5PR07MB1622; 4:jn5Jzpzs0hAi5B7/c8JDx8h9b7vL6wVHKlyAU/ub1GrZJFcenUbKQL8/VtMpvMKLbdQXGF/opLtrS/z+zYmxl3tW8gA04B/8HGqHXtiAaiiievrQq3AK/TM9GlrRC9iRIkVtHit1hZ9srY8OkUpKmFSxmTB/LpbHBMSV93ti96+87EqKHvpDhz4koPaRRxdk5RrFhZQkKxaf8T9qvo9XpnZClbprwW4I87I6XcEuY+hsDx0KyJXyQ0/eIlYpmsO1XtjnWR3M+hT9bJi9uMT9dxALueg3rMfOC19t6HlHgL/tpQ3DlG5ImXq6EZ/4/dMZBEOfLDxeGcf50dQG76cfzviRs726S4yNTProVt5dM1MsP2go/okyL+ynatUstK7A
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0954EE4910
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4630300001)(6009001)(13464003)(377454003)(24454002)(377424004)(47776003)(5001770100001)(44736004)(189998001)(62236002)(81166006)(84392002)(14496001)(4326007)(9686002)(66066001)(2906002)(116806002)(50226002)(1456003)(8676002)(81686999)(81816999)(77096005)(76176999)(586003)(86362001)(1556002)(19580405001)(5008740100001)(42186005)(15975445007)(61296003)(33646002)(19580395003)(92566002)(3846002)(50986999)(50466002)(6116002)(2870700001)(5004730100002)(44716002)(23676002)(74416001)(7726001)(4720700001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB5PR07MB1622; H:pc6; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:nov; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;DB5PR07MB1622;23: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
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; DB5PR07MB1622; 5:pLfCkHG4rrn0LisYJa10ma0l9ui6coIu7JXeaz+d740kwaEnM1hVJM87Np1r3UvIfgNDpiB2AcljLePATShYTJaGPcMQuCy+TLoYge6dfsIfwv7GjmtiaWij6WptvZXUWdfVHfVlTG9Lpj17deDnbQ==; 24:DoooTJ72Rm+5E00fTREDbZ30WrGjNTNZz/pLmh+nlnl5AHC5GKowRJkv+N3WgI+teoxlk5bIePnHt2WQ/iPbJ39FuyeXH9UrVo05osEQbzE=; 7:FJwXL99TBoejsIfzHNqruC/hf0+VkwxmmkH95S2rNyLHW0kxXhERSJsvvQjrPudielnDArZoqHvpdKhAOTC/H0/LjufOHPGrpK/TDvOe0VbNODPYBwoLy9ByYqwdWMHz/h8sLMUy9oCUaLVrUnYRFtm1CyJH75OaqPYDnK7VI/teeixP+/eaBZgl0ADmR5ux
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:23
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 May 2016 16:22:53.3304 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5PR07MB1622
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/ufY5USRPY9ed9JrQ8XZnWRWLTTM>
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] RFC 1738 is made obsolete by what?
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 16:23:15 -0000

---- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Kerwin" <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
Cc: "IETF Apps Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:16 PM

On 26 May 2016 at 06:08, Paul E. Jones <paulej@packetizer.com> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> RFC 1738 has been made obsolete, but the data that the RFC editor is
> provided (and as shown on tools) is that this document was made
obsolete by
> the telnet and gopher URL schemes.  Surely that wasn't the message
that was
> intended to be conveyed.  See: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1738.
>
> Wouldn't it be correct to say that this was made obsolete by 2396,
which
> was then made obsolete by 3986?
>
> If I'm correct, then I think the "Obsoleted By" information is
> misleading.  If I'm wrong, then I'm entirely confused and I still
assert
> that it's misleading :-)
>
> Is there a process to clarify this?
>
> Paul
>
>
​It'd be good to find this out. I have in my archives a brief discussion
we
had on 2013-06-26 about this very issue. It was never resolved cleanly,
and
so we find ourselves here today with my file: draft which says it
obsoletes
an already obsolete RFC even though it only replaces one sub-section
thereof (§3.10, about half a page of RFC 1738) -- like telnet and
gopher.

I wouldn't be surprised if this piece of metadata ends up being a bit of
a
blocker, so it'd be good to get it straightened up.

<tp>

Do as RFC6270 did

"6270 The 'tn3270' URI Scheme. M. Yevstifeyev. June 2011. (Format:
     TXT=10876 bytes) (Updates RFC2355, RFC1738, RFC1041) (Status:
     PROPOSED STANDARD)
"

Tom Petch


Cheers
--
  Matthew Kerwin
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/



------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------


> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email