Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-00

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Mon, 06 May 2013 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2060721F9355 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2013 15:26:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RsDtvhU40jBz for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2013 15:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC7D21F9354 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 May 2013 15:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.226.234.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r46MQX3c017855 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 6 May 2013 15:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1367879205; bh=vMA3T/RH01ttQJrGZJ1ZrtKYDpdyk9IcqeSH7u6DHO4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=ZL5bRKnP0vVVo/Lv86G3ouwIo8wCsW6Ss0LTy2pE3HEBW48fr7blQcLd3rqPVyNLX Ek5CT4c/Bf3PUAWyO8wr/mmRdiSnRzSx3bepqV53vOkt9KHU14NJDe19tBQdpFY9p7 BbLQYxE5kAIe0EPUfqp1vggS5HuXjVfRoJne+DSI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1367879205; i=@elandsys.com; bh=vMA3T/RH01ttQJrGZJ1ZrtKYDpdyk9IcqeSH7u6DHO4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=EhOPwG4dA5qU3WUqh/Qg0r76/3GJJyZBjJGmUz0bS7jtmv8H6P1bg2eItkS84mYem NoxExNZYACg0xqaryg1KQSjJoS01Kh1BK+TfRIC5qW7xamVi9VTas4+4PinTulUMt5 /nUXV5jCy0f/u0x2xiwCvZkzYbWQaQcyk9acM1AM=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130506151149.0b9793b8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 15:25:01 -0700
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwaMWbLbgAquXXnC1a_CRgu4zUgHwykc71_on2-99eAxww@mail.g mail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130503141649.0d8252f0@elandnews.com> <5187DA74.9020204@tana.it> <CAL0qLwaMWbLbgAquXXnC1a_CRgu4zUgHwykc71_on2-99eAxww@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-00
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 22:26:50 -0000

At 13:43 06-05-2013, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>That's a good procedural question.  I think it has to be because it 
>involves IANA actions that are being amended, but I think this is 
>something that can be sorted out during IESG Evaluation.

I do not have to read RFC 5451 to understand 
draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-00 [1].  I read it though.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/current/msg01365.html