Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-03

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 29 May 2013 01:17 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2941921F8DB7 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2013 18:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H3bCEukoC5-N for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2013 18:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6EB21F8D79 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 May 2013 18:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7328 invoked from network); 29 May 2013 01:17:31 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=1c9f.51a5572b.k1305; bh=exqddQRqse4SfE+xHqwCjZLgStarumUovgTdUBYpPbM=; b=hy2UG5LpMUWw3JDGP5xiaHjjxnEdSg5fHoeOWjtgWgpn5TD1dgG2Y49jd7NU2iieJIQGzgft6z1wRygV5dTLlZMXezFQuCVxpfDRAlyS5aDkalRt5RvUWQZOthpqvIuNd0J1skmXm1a1cl/Wm/F8tsX23oWlO7aLmMHscNmjyAc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=1c9f.51a5572b.k1305; bh=exqddQRqse4SfE+xHqwCjZLgStarumUovgTdUBYpPbM=; b=BSBcUYY+EA82jHiZYqX19vSk1xuk39vLCLLkgmmuORTzZS1PRj9KQpw/BfV0OP19zAE0V+rK2OQxXNdy+LMVMBN9LMqOMcyHYtLAL59sDuzJIannwryIqfYL+jvgv/s7s9IG8/WbYilwYwrKGeJ8o1nULXOrQMZXgr2pRhnCcKs=
Received: (ofmipd 127.0.0.1); 29 May 2013 01:17:09 -0000
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 21:17:24 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305282115330.81983@joyce.lan>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-Reply-To: <01OU6TEMJ65Q000054@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <01OTO93GD6L2000054@mauve.mrochek.com> <20130515202613.24981.qmail@joyce.lan> <01OTOENRSJ6Q000054@mauve.mrochek.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305152133120.63512@joyce.lan> <CAL0qLwb8gzOvC6eXmg+0+etuiTrdRMQyNBOk7BMns-Csfj4Wxw@mail.gmail.com> <01OTSF48H616000054@mauve.mrochek.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305182237110.74365@joyce.lan> <CAL0qLwYUEsoHLs1_1Rb6ipEyjqBVLkFpTdhge_Q215=csETM-g@mail.gmail.com> <01OU6TEMJ65Q000054@mauve.mrochek.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-03
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 01:17:28 -0000

> There really isn't a one size fits all answer here, and it's silly to think
> one can be found.

Perhaps it's better to describe results than methods, e.g., if the process 
leads to a bounce, what you bounce better be close enough to what you 
received that the other party can recogize it as something they sent.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.