IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer?

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Tue, 11 January 2011 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DF93A6A95 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:45:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.056, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qDN+SHHfYdSg for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:45:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C823A6A94 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:45:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so20699699fxm.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:47:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.72.6 with SMTP id k6mr39280faj.46.1294775247952; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:47:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.126.212 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:47:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [216.239.45.130]
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1341E73D79@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1341E73D79@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:47:27 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikfWyCy2GWJnxfwZM-bW3f=d_FbVB2smdRkO_im@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer?
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:45:12 -0000

Oh, and others have also found this slide-set, from a talk I gave at
the Vancouver IETF, useful:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/70/slides/xmltut-0.pdf  -Tim

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <msk@cloudmark.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I’ve got a project on the go that will result in a few different I-Ds for
> consideration, one of which contains a specification for a new XML-based
> reporting format.  Can someone suggest some RFCs that have done a good job
> of the same sort of thing in the past that I could use as a template for
> such work, or a BCP or similar?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -MSK
>
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email