Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-02.txt
"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 19 May 2013 15:09 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C6B21F89D5 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 May 2013 08:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CCo87x2MCS7U for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 May 2013 08:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7B121F898B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 May 2013 08:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 73647 invoked from network); 19 May 2013 15:09:26 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=11fae.5198eb26.k1305; bh=SHRJjTQrgswaPzf9aFKSsz4xUXgffh61cECALrXVOP0=; b=AoppoeBJQVeG8bnoxz6cVOP56FW4hEUqSJKf+sLHLGvrne3ADmraXJXeZeEnxq7kAlLuCSRM7r3++0/K5o38wcdprlF/nbisuNHakpYYd05LHSKrmDVJfP02VX/RlsMp5W/X5T6D7QnHGMbckgFoBMrEpkFvokx59QkmOJBj/0U=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=11fae.5198eb26.k1305; bh=SHRJjTQrgswaPzf9aFKSsz4xUXgffh61cECALrXVOP0=; b=sKl0Q4TUZWIqKeqHnEG6BK7C5TQ48a8/tdrxvBp31zKlzh8FI+a97U0bi3w7XVwZ+DlZojK42DeH8lrGLSobiKyTgA4D3z9U9jPlM10jkO/ijkOwLFHMvPU5Wz10ZCMR6fYQXnl512E3axTWhX/AzwJairSG757r/C0/zr9292w=
Received: (ofmipd 127.0.0.1); 19 May 2013 15:09:04 -0000
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 11:09:26 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305191104290.85717@joyce.lan>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwaDwgyKH4DV=s9djw2pf7ULHPzbDn8Unhd_rJLbMaMd1Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwZuMOky2rLBm4UYhgNJmyXaPyO25WhBGrrgK4DUKcAWqg@mail.gmail.com> <20130519052116.75996.qmail@joyce.lan> <CAL0qLwaDwgyKH4DV=s9djw2pf7ULHPzbDn8Unhd_rJLbMaMd1Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; BOUNDARY="3825401791-2084301205-1368976166=:85717"
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 15:09:28 -0000
>> adding /1 after the authserv-id. I hear the sound of screaming from >> the other end of the hall as the unexpected slash breaks the >> filtering. > > You don't have to change anything in a generator to remain compliant. The > "/1" is optional if the version number isn't actually changing. Right, but if I do add the /1, consumers that haven't upgraded will break even though nothing substantive has changed. If there were something substantively different between 5451 and bis, so that consumers had to change to consume something other than the version number, I would probably be OK with the slash. But in this case, the slash doesn't solve any problem I can see, and is likely to cause some interop issues. R's, John
- [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc… internet-drafts
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… John Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… John R Levine
- [apps-discuss] Slash and version number in Authen… S Moonesamy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Slash and version number in Au… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [apps-discuss] Slash and version number in Au… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] Slash and version number in Au… Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-discuss] Slash and version number in Au… Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-discuss] Slash and version number in Au… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [apps-discuss] Slash and version number in Au… Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… John Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… John R Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Murray S. Kucherawy