[apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-polk-ipr-disclosure

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Tue, 22 May 2012 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1393D21F8631 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 May 2012 11:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Img284tyn8YF for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 May 2012 11:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46CD21F861B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 May 2012 11:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.25]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id D6ri1j0010ZaKgw016riuH; Tue, 22 May 2012 11:51:48 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=eMmRfQV1 c=1 sm=1 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:17 a=LvckAehuu68A:10 a=Gp0LT_fy6AwA:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=b6nfwRhkAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=f6QBZBVeCI_P1ozfDKUA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=clQFuFiZWUaoYM8o-yQA:7 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::2524:76b6:a865:539c%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Tue, 22 May 2012 11:51:42 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "appsdir@ietf.org" <appsdir@ietf.org>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "draft-polk-ipr-disclosure.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-polk-ipr-disclosure.all@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AppsDir review of draft-polk-ipr-disclosure
Thread-Index: Ac04S+0n6tY4XXwLSJu+kD08eI2VPg==
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 18:51:41 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392812C31D@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.20.2.121]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392812C31Dexchmbx901corpclo_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1337712708; bh=xMsv2f9/j8JGuLWgktCCHs/2mPHpIOlBoScJ9YdwQH0=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=DYMzQWdfh3YEBvNDiyEkOZLa5ulqoDbKVys0ZM05K/k3qndV4fBLAB1FNKmMqKsjp hPWS2r2sscTgT9uyCTCHxN7hP3xCArwa1wNopixbN1VVMy1xb/fkAk//lCGm41wK3D dY9uJ31ZWnkPUs/6lPTNFh9i+BtB6L7CSjdOvr/E=
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-polk-ipr-disclosure
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 18:53:19 -0000

I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer for this draft.  (For background on appsdir, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.  Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-polk-ipr-disclosure-03
Title: Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Disclosure Rules
Reviewer: Murray S. Kucherawy
Review Date: May 22, 2012
IETF Last Call Date: ends May 28, 2012
IESG Telechat Date: not scheduled

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC, though I have a question about that proposed status.

Major Issues:

1. Should this not be a BCP?

Minor Issues:

(none)

Nits:

1. Section 1.1: s/section/Section/

Appendix A, several locations: a "&t;" entity should probably be "&lt;".

-MSK