Re: [apps-discuss] RFC5451bis processing
Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Wed, 03 April 2013 13:32 UTC
Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F069021F8D28 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 06:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.726
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.726 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y9RIWozdSW4b for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 06:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-f53.google.com (mail-oa0-f53.google.com [209.85.219.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997F821F8B35 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 06:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id m17so1490687oag.26 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Rl4tY0eAKiV4H3LLhaI8dmPgRWOB+hx20y7uwRqlU2Y=; b=YrbaYk4uc2bTwSPeyMNcHThgoWwDQ/GSAniwp6XR8BEhaaNC9ZsvmhXAKHQ7aTMjPn F10IGWN4ELWh4jfDe2WjWEH7oVZAmn9utj/H5+g350ss4iQ3w2X+GIOfTdn5LRxKOebJ dF4ohbcprl+VapMfFR0Tc9GvzzMu2S3TSUDq8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Rl4tY0eAKiV4H3LLhaI8dmPgRWOB+hx20y7uwRqlU2Y=; b=cYapTJr7H1Umw/PSKkhVOp5gpSwbO5OCPsoYQNw0FF7SnHrRwVNSIQyaiDSYyOK3NK QdPcfom6AamgCFWEpTFZSnYADnIe8bKovWZNSaCbXSCbOTKnKaSBCsDJMi1x/T43xyHQ npIbGizPdKw8XB9gu5biIZYG1uIVI5LVFPm2etPbkdFzEe86xwYEFbTXkUXCfNKp4VSp o+Fw+bn6pNcf9eV3CD7xmQFUw9wS/GCrRBOwXYiGWz0mNRdGPv0CbDgBWSZ4UCellcOk d2XIG3aFp4Di+6Vjg564TGRNFY7cZ10RMtZFeZS0VezttvIkDZKbLEcGfEKrfCons6Ai qlBg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.34.165 with SMTP id a5mr1044941obj.70.1364995960194; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.22.105 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 06:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwbOrM2k=cfKx+0BW4K+YZJ-ByAms7dFw2EySB0xM_4W_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130331154836.0a822628@elandnews.com> <20130331232855.87940.qmail@joyce.lan> <CAL0qLwbOrM2k=cfKx+0BW4K+YZJ-ByAms7dFw2EySB0xM_4W_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:32:40 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzwyGX8MWU1C1mUkujCZ4+Uh8+s4TH9ynyuo_3T=ooc1zQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2229853dff304d974e366"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkofDVIZDN8Q+T2FDXiHqQuvK9dQOSyQWKP7xkSwRgjyk6x2Sb+E50UAbyfMTXGBHjMH03B
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] RFC5451bis processing
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:32:42 -0000
I actively support putting it through appsawg given it's standards-track and appears to be aimed at moving along it. The broader community of appsawg should be of benefit. Dave.
- Re: [apps-discuss] RFC5451bis processing S Moonesamy
- Re: [apps-discuss] RFC5451bis processing John Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] RFC5451bis processing Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] RFC5451bis processing Dave Cridland