Re: [apps-discuss] font/* (and draft-freed-media-type-regs)

Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> Mon, 21 November 2011 12:22 UTC

Return-Path: <chris@w3.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B8821F8BD5 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:22:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 213TIX+y3p8R for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:22:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jay.w3.org (ssh.w3.org [128.30.52.60]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5363321F8BF9 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:22:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by jay.w3.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <chris@w3.org>) id 1RSSsy-0000z7-Vl; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 07:22:09 -0500
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:22:15 +0100
From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.95.6) Home
Organization: W3C
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <210354501.20111121132215@w3.org>
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-Reply-To: <01O8KCG4WZZE00XBUL@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D0611DABF0F@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <4EC0C2C8.2010500@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <01O8EV98HXC800RCTX@mauve.mrochek.com> <99733F9E-CF97-40BD-B438-300E309D3BF4@apple.com> <7534F85A589E654EB1E44E5CFDC19E3D117FCD6BF2@wob-email-01.agfamonotype.org> <4EC31D1D.1000509@stpeter.im> <7534F85A589E654EB1E44E5CFDC19E3D117FCD6ED2@wob-email-01.agfamonotype.org> <4EC6031F.7000002@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <7534F85A589E654EB1E44E5CFDC19E3D117FCD7382@wob-email-01.agfamonotype.org> <01O8KCG4WZZE00XBUL@mauve.mrochek.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:03:24 -0800
Cc: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "gadams@xfsi.com Adams" <gadams@xfsi.com>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] font/* (and draft-freed-media-type-regs)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:22:24 -0000

(Catching upon this thread)

On Friday, November 18, 2011, 8:50:51 PM, Ned wrote:

>> Besides vendor-specific types, the only registered font type that I am aware
>> of is 'application/font-woff'. W3C WebFonts WG has submitted a registration for
>> this subtype about a year ago, and the text of the registration is available as
>> Annex B of the WOFF specification:

>> http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF/spec/#appendix-b

NF> Submitted to whom? It isn't on the IANA page so it hasn't been approved unless
NF> approval was very recent.

In accordance with the usual W3C process for media type registrations
- the registration template is an appendix in the technical specification
- at last call, it gets sent to ietf-types to start discussion
- at proposed rec (ie one the spec is fixed) W3C will ask for IESG approval. This has not happened yet; the spec is in Candidate  Recommendation phase.

NF> It's one thing if this registration is still bouncing around inside of the W3C
NF> process - that's entirely the W3C's baliwick.

Its bouncing around the early stages of both W3C and IETF/IANA processes.

NF>  But if this was submitted to the IESG for approval,

No, not yet, since that requires a stable document to reference,and changes are still possible as a result of Candidate Recommendation implementation experience.

>> ISO SC29/WG11 has prepared the draft to register application/font-sfnt but it
>> wasn't submitted yet.

It has neither been sent to ietf-types not has it been sent to IESG to request approval.

NF> FWIW, there are presently four registered font-ish types:

NF> application/font-tdpfr (RFC 3073)

Yes, Bitstream TrueDoc portable font resource (as used in Netscape 4.x). 

NF> application/vnd.font-fontforge-sfd

Right, the fontforge source file format. Hmm,so UFO format is not yet registered.

NF> application/vnd.ms-fontobject
NF> application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.fontTable+xml

I was unaware of those, thanks for the pointer. of course, had all these been registered in a font/* tree then discovery would be so much easier.



-- 
 Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain                 
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
 Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups