Re: [apps-discuss] Apps-Review Team Review: draft-ietf-enum-iax-10

Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info> Tue, 19 April 2011 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <jyee@afilias.info>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8192BE07DF for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z3y9TR+ouWvd for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound.afilias.info (outbound.afilias.info [69.46.124.26]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CFBE0702 for <Apps-Discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ms5.yyz2.afilias-ops.info ([10.50.129.111] helo=smtp.afilias.info) by outbound.afilias.info with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1QCF7e-0005dH-62 for Apps-Discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:53:58 +0000
Received: from mail-gy0-f178.google.com ([209.85.160.178]) by smtp.afilias.info with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1QCF7e-0001US-5L for Apps-Discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:53:58 +0000
Received: by gyd12 with SMTP id 12so5840515gyd.9 for <Apps-Discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.74.13 with SMTP id w13mr5929045yba.313.1303235637869; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jyee-lt.tor.afilias-int.info (tor-gateway.afilias.info [199.15.87.4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x4sm321746ybl.8.2011.04.19.10.53.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104191201521.4563@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:53:52 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <30217A32-0BCF-4074-BA49-AB87E57C7655@afilias.info>
References: <E3A6FACA-4A62-499F-8264-DC2A5C585716@afilias.info> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104191201521.4563@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
To: Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: klaus.darilion@nic.at, ed guy <edguy@CleverSpoke.com>, Jason Livingood <jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>, Apps-Discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Apps-Review Team Review: draft-ietf-enum-iax-10
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:54:00 -0000

Hi Bernie,

On 2011-04-19, at 6:22 AM, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote:

> Hi Joseph
> 
> Thanks for your review and feedback on draft-ietf-enum-iax-10.
> My comments inline.
> 
> 
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Joseph Yee wrote:
> 
>> Nits:
>>  (1)
>>  In Section 5, IANA Considerations, words suggested to make registration type more specific
>> 
>>  Original
>>  This document requests registration of the 'iax' Enumservice
>>  according....
>> 
>>  Suggestion
>>  This document requests registration of the Enumservice
>>  Type 'iax' according.....
> 
> Could be changed, although IMHO not really needed.

No concern if not changed.

> 
> 
>>  (2)
>>  In Section 5, IANA Considerations, specifications reference should include RFC6116
>> 
>>  Original
>>  according to the guidelines and specifications in [RFC6117]
>>  and the definitions in Section 2 in this document.
>> 
>>  Suggestion
>>  according to the guidelines and specifications in [RFC6117],
>>  [RFC6116] and the definitions in Section 2 in this document.
> 
> 
> Adding a reference to RFC 6116 just confuses the reader, as RFC 6116 does not contain any specifications concerning IANA registration. When we revised RFC 3761, we purposly made a split between ENUM (as protocol) and the Enumservices (IANA registration, process).
> (A reader who tries to find IANA Enumservices related content in RFC 6116 due to such a reference will be disappointed, as all he finds is a reference to RFC 6117.)
> 
> Therefore, a reference to RFC 6116 to the IANA considerations section of draft-ietf-enum-iax should not be added.

Thanks for clarifying terms.  I read more in depth of both RFC6116 and RFC6117 on referencing, and agreed it's not necessary.

Best,
Joseph

> 
> cheers,
> Bernie (document shephard of draft-ietf-enum-iax & author of RFC 6117)
> 
> PS: I added Jason (the designated Expert for this document) to the Cc.
> 
> --
> 
> http://ucom.ch/
> Tech Consulting for Internet Standardization
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss