Re: [apps-discuss] Changes in draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-05

t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Thu, 31 May 2012 09:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A0E21F858E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2012 02:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.292
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.292 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.307, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fn+4kwDY-7y4 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2012 02:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (va3ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9AF21F8570 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 May 2012 02:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail78-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.240) by VA3EHSOBE004.bigfish.com (10.7.40.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 31 May 2012 09:34:44 +0000
Received: from mail78-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail78-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2B06017E; Thu, 31 May 2012 09:34:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.55.224.141; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:DB3PRD0702HT004.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -28
X-BigFish: PS-28(zz9371I542M1432Nzz1202hzz1033IL8275bh8275dhz2dh2a8h5a9h668h839hd24hf0ah304l)
Received: from mail78-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail78-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 1338456882925907_15530; Thu, 31 May 2012 09:34:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from VA3EHSMHS031.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.242]) by mail78-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA9A4C00E6; Thu, 31 May 2012 09:34:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3PRD0702HT004.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.55.224.141) by VA3EHSMHS031.bigfish.com (10.7.99.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 31 May 2012 09:34:41 +0000
Received: from CH1PRD0610HT001.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (157.56.244.229) by pod51017.outlook.com (10.3.4.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.15.74.2; Thu, 31 May 2012 09:34:55 +0000
Message-ID: <007401cd3f10$39ca5380$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
References: <20120529111155.16641.37358.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120529104653.09b0da90@resistor.net>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 10:31:49 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [157.56.244.229]
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Changes in draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-05
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 09:35:14 -0000

Yes, my comments are addressed, thank you.

Tom Petch


----- Original Message -----
From: "S Moonesamy" <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
To: <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 6:57 PM
> Hello,
>
> [Bcc to people who sent comments on
draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04]
>
> I went through the comments submitted during the Last Call of
> draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg72824.html
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg72825.html
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg72826.html
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg72827.html
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg72924.html
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg72966.html
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg72976.html
>
>
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg05435.html
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg03293.html
>
> The changes in draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-05 are meant to
> address those comments.
>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy