Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02.txt

"t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com> Tue, 31 January 2012 16:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E002E21F8596 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:33:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.932
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.932 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.900, BAYES_50=0.001, DATE_IN_PAST_24_48=1.219, FAKE_REPLY_C=2.012, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id seM+snO5dWwv for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:33:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.btconnect.com (c2beaomr07.btconnect.com [213.123.26.185]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB26921F8593 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:33:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from host86-163-138-100.range86-163.btcentralplus.com (HELO pc6) ([86.163.138.100]) by c2beaomr07.btconnect.com with SMTP id GBW26184; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:33:25 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <002501ccdf64$8db56220$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:33:40 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A0B0302.4F2817D4.0072, actions=tag
X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=7/50, refid=2.7.2:2012.1.30.73017:17:7.586, ip=86.163.138.100, rules=__HAS_MSGID, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_1, __SANE_MSGID, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, CT_TP_8859_1, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_800_899, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __OUTLOOK_MUA, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2beaomr07.btconnect.com
X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0203.4F2817D5.0187, ss=1, re=0.000, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2011-07-25 19:15:43, dmn=2011-05-27 18:58:46, mode=multiengine
X-Junkmail-IWF: false
Cc: apps-discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:33:41 -0000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave CROCKER" <dhc@dcrocker.net>
To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
Cc: <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 6:33 PM
> On 1/27/2012 8:08 AM, t.petch wrote:
> I do not see it in the I-D, about what, if anything, this I-D expects to
change
> with the parameters currently in use.
>
> If you think that's a problem, please explain why and offer some text to cover
it.

Add at the end of the Introduction paragraph 2
'This document makes no recommendation as to whether existing X- parameters
should continue to be used or should be migrated to a format without the X-."

because otherwise this obvious question is left in midair.

Tom Petch
>
> d/
> --
>
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
>
>
> .