IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Tue, 30 August 2011 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D073321F8E1A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.034
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.034 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.435, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nvYDT4tF81KH for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1E421F8E01 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.72]) with mapi; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:25:52 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:25:52 -0700
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt
Thread-Index: AcxmzCLQt7ErtqSfR3G31kkH06ZYSAAdfxcg
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF99D@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20110830041853.24036.37.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110830041853.24036.37.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 18:24:25 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 9:19 PM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-
> 00.txt
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories. This draft is a work item of the Applications Area Working
> Group Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 	Title           : The Multipart/Report Media Type for the Reporting of Mail System Administrative Messages
> 	Author(s)       : Murray S. Kucherawy
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt
> 	Pages           : 13
> 	Date            : 2011-08-29

This is a straight conversion from the individual submission, which contained what I think was the consensus from the Quebec City meeting plus some list discussion afterwards.  Review please (especially Ned and Keith!).

Thanks,
-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email