IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Proposed "spfbis" working group charter

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Mon, 14 November 2011 06:31 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A4211E820F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:31:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.807
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.208, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TGyfQxedJzRo for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:31:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CB711E8209 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:31:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.72]) with mapi; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:31:18 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:31:15 -0800
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] Proposed "spfbis" working group charter
Thread-Index: Acyik8ou1EOvgCioQIGY/4BNOhoYHQAAxINg
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C15012@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <201111140546.pAE5k1aW035215@medusa.blackops.org> <4EC0B043.2060907@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <4EC0B043.2060907@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Proposed "spfbis" working group charter
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:31:19 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Martin J. Dürst" [mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp]
> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 10:08 PM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Proposed "spfbis" working group charter
> 
> I'm somewhat surprised that there is a long charter text, but it ends
> essentially with "what we'll do is in draft foo". I think the "what
> we'll do" is the core of the charter, and shouldn't be just a
> reference.

It was brought to my attention that you might believe the working group's scope is defined in the "-scope" draft.  It's not; that document proposes an extension to SPF called "scope", but doesn't contain any scope definition for the proposed working group.

-MSK

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status