IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg-received-state

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Fri, 08 June 2012 04:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D730111E80BD for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hWQRmNyrCV8L for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB1011E80B2 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OGF3KJK8BK00374P@mauve.mrochek.com> for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OGBNHXOPCG000058@mauve.mrochek.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <01OGF3KH2VL0000058@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:37:04 -0700
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Thu, 07 Jun 2012 07:01:13 -0700" <CAL0qLwaUeW8-q2DKr=H6V_sZSK9KqJseY9E3h+KncGhLn=higw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN
References: <CAL0qLwY1DCP9RY7cykwrPi48A_1h_FJUXo5eRWkn3Rw=rFXpBw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVBuET9h-QHEtS=genmJnJ6bfKk=KD0bTJQvZJApAsY_ww@mail.gmail.com> <4FD08CA3.6080504@dcrocker.net> <CAL0qLwaUeW8-q2DKr=H6V_sZSK9KqJseY9E3h+KncGhLn=higw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg-received-state
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 04:38:46 -0000

> OK, I'll take it down to FCFS for the version that goes to the IESG.
> Unless there's objection I'll try to get that posted this weekend, which is
> about half way through WGLC.

If that's the consensus then I won't object. As I say, I think the liklihood
of there being a problem is low, but I do think the possibility for a problem
exists.

Oh, and my bad for not catching the original specification required
requirement, which was clearly overkill.

				Ned

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status