IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg-received-state

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 07 June 2012 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCBD521F8611 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 07:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PntSuR5Fen-3 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 07:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20F721F881E for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 07:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.102.2.236] ([212.184.65.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q57ELsKH007261 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 07:21:56 -0700
Message-ID: <4FD0B8FF.6080302@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 16:21:51 +0200
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwY1DCP9RY7cykwrPi48A_1h_FJUXo5eRWkn3Rw=rFXpBw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVBuET9h-QHEtS=genmJnJ6bfKk=KD0bTJQvZJApAsY_ww@mail.gmail.com> <4FD08CA3.6080504@dcrocker.net> <CAL0qLwaUeW8-q2DKr=H6V_sZSK9KqJseY9E3h+KncGhLn=higw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwaUeW8-q2DKr=H6V_sZSK9KqJseY9E3h+KncGhLn=higw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Thu, 07 Jun 2012 07:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg-received-state
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:22:11 -0000

On 6/7/2012 4:01 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Do we make it easier and let in some cruft along with the good stuff or
> do we make it harder and keep out some good stuff because registering is
> too much hassle?
>
> I think the latter is the better choice, because the cruft doesn't
> actually hurt anything and there's a very, very large namespace that can
> afford to be wasted.

Murray correctly interpreted what I meant, but I feel compelled to 
correct the email and archive by noting that I meant former and not 
latter...

d/
-- 
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status