Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt
Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@mac.com> Fri, 22 January 2010 21:53 UTC
Return-Path: <algermissen1971@mac.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F213A6774 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:53:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.339
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.339 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.740, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lYHvIqNSn2bB for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:53:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtpout017.mac.com (asmtpout017.mac.com [17.148.16.92]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DA13A63EB for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:53:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Received: from [192.168.2.102] ([84.144.69.192]) by asmtp017.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KWO00AAZ4SLTY20@asmtp017.mac.com> for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:53:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1001220247
Message-id: <62C36D7B-2385-47AB-8A92-DEA15A81B99E@mac.com>
From: Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@mac.com>
To: Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@subbu.org>
In-reply-to: <0460AF05-93FE-41D1-8E7D-D2FE6889C1F9@subbu.org>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:53:08 +0100
References: <20100119053002.5CD613A683B@core3.amsl.com> <E4FF7733-D744-4AC3-AB99-66A12868E4CE@mnot.net> <A70E9FE8-512E-42A1-8523-042368DABBBC@subbu.org> <EA551C32-6AC0-4AE1-AB22-0BA8876022C9@mac.com> <0460AF05-93FE-41D1-8E7D-D2FE6889C1F9@subbu.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:53:32 -0000
On Jan 22, 2010, at 7:19 PM, Subbu Allamaraju wrote: > You mean "link-extension" params? Hmm, no I am getting confused :-) I;d say link-extension == field. Mark? Jan > > Subbu > > On Jan 20, 2010, at 11:37 PM, Jan Algermissen wrote: > >> >> On Jan 20, 2010, at 10:38 PM, Subbu Allamaraju wrote: >> >>> The usage of fields is not clear. Sec. 6.3 says that "entries in >>> the Link Relation Type Registry can be extended with application- >>> specific data". But the BNF in Sec. 5 does not specify fields. >>> Could you clarify the intent of fields? >> >> I understand fields to be meant as link relation specific parameters. >> >> Jan >> >> >> >>> >>> Subbu >>> >>> On Jan 18, 2010, at 9:31 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>> >>>>> From: Internet-Draft@ietf.org >>>>> Date: 19 January 2010 4:30:02 PM AEDT >>>>> To: mnot@pobox.com, draft-nottingham-http-link-header@tools.ietf.org >>>>> ,lisa.dusseault@gmail.com >>>>> Subject: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link- >>>>> header-07.txt >>>>> >>>>> New version (-07) has been submitted for draft-nottingham-http- >>>>> link-header-07.txt. >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt >>>>> Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed >>>>> >>>>> Diff from previous version: >>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07 >>>>> >>>>> IETF Secretariat. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> ----------------------------------- >> Jan Algermissen, Consultant >> >> Mail: algermissen@acm.org >> Blog: http://www.nordsc.com/blog/ >> Work: http://www.nordsc.com/ >> ----------------------------------- >> >> >> > > ----------------------------------- Jan Algermissen, Consultant Mail: algermissen@acm.org Blog: http://www.nordsc.com/blog/ Work: http://www.nordsc.com/ -----------------------------------
- Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-notting… Julian Reschke
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-h… Jan Algermissen
- anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham… Julian Reschke
- rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-ht… Julian Reschke
- parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-nottingha… Julian Reschke
- editorial LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-li… Julian Reschke
- exposing sensitive information in URIs - LC comme… Julian Reschke
- Re: parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-notti… Julian Reschke
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-h… Mike Burrows
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-h… Subbu Allamaraju
- Re: parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-notti… Mike Burrows
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottin… Mark Nottingham
- Re: parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-notti… Mark Nottingham
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingha… Mark Nottingham
- Re: editorial LC comments on draft-nottingham-htt… Mark Nottingham
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-h… Mark Nottingham
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottin… Julian Reschke
- Re: parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-notti… Julian Reschke
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingha… Julian Reschke
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-h… Subbu Allamaraju
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-h… Jan Algermissen
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottin… Mark Nottingham
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-h… Mark Nottingham
- Re: exposing sensitive information in URIs - LC c… Mark Nottingham
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-h… Subbu Allamaraju
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottin… Julian Reschke
- Re: editorial LC comments on draft-nottingham-htt… Mark Nottingham
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingha… Mark Nottingham
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingha… Anne van Kesteren
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingha… Julian Reschke
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingha… Mark Nottingham
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottin… Mark Nottingham
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingha… Julian Reschke
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottin… Julian Reschke
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingha… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingha… Mark Nottingham
- Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingha… Julian Reschke
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottin… Mark Nottingham
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottin… Julian Reschke
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottin… Mark Nottingham
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottin… Julian Reschke
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottin… Mark Nottingham
- Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottin… Julian Reschke