[apps-discuss] Documenting UTF-1 as Historic

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Fri, 10 June 2011 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D6711E81E6 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.478
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.478 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.121, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BoN0uA3yxkj4 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D1711E8090 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so1932941fxm.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JkwN1HXkDbgNbdWuxzT7+VR23JdihNIW85SgCiINyRo=; b=Bnpo7HernEq3zJ7IDndLyLgsh+DoZSYVCOyTF0KDCvPIhUomde+r+ZSqI3DxO+HxDh K1L1eMWJfOF8CBq/RAmqxYvvCANbQidLM2PFq828VG4iWGwTMILzEAh7QTI/VPQJESii uOrOOdt/hmjsp/SFqZch7xVC4ICmlYRkCEPcs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Rs2XI2vbw0U2xW9wtsjWEtcZGV2lcJnChB3KIOTK3deuIHsPsKBh7ernqiWqqdCbWq M/5Pu9bhqDERKVmmbu4AYxYRamceETZBCsN/vS+xQ+38e7t6aRGe43DfJsWpoNriYSwd Sg26ro+saOhoFFsgNpuzemAh690agge4GusDo=
Received: by 10.223.5.28 with SMTP id 28mr2157036fat.103.1307720010085; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e16sm1107153fak.41.2011.06.10.08.33.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DF23976.4080301@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:34:14 +0300
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Apps-discuss list <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [apps-discuss] Documenting UTF-1 as Historic
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:33:33 -0000

Hello,

There are a number of RFCs defining transformation formats of ISO 
10646/Unicode - various UTFs.  I mean RFC 3629 (UTF-8), RFC 2152 
(UTF-7), RFC 2781 (UTF-16) and others.  However, I've noticed UTF-1 
isn't properly documented (or, at least, there is no formal record of 
it).  However, since UTF-1 has never been widely used, I suppose it 
could be formally documented in Historic RFC, taking 
http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/ISO-IR/178.pdf as a basis.  Any thoughts on 
this?

Mykyta Yevstifeyev