Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Patch

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 02 November 2011 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC1A21F8C0A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 06:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.796, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Poqf7DTBSkQr for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 06:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3656221F8BE8 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 06:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Nov 2011 13:57:03 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp015) with SMTP; 02 Nov 2011 14:57:03 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19EmdggGolEMViAz6XF5CoWTWIOU+XFQ2tggtz9Za a0CLN3Pbka+NYm
Message-ID: <4EB14C2E.8040208@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 14:57:02 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_D=FCrig?= <mduerig@adobe.com>
References: <4EB1482E.1040600@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EB1482E.1040600@adobe.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Patch
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:57:06 -0000

On 2011-11-02 14:39, Michael Dürig wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This looks very interesting. There seem to be a lot of similarities to
> an earlier proposal [1, 2]. What is missing (wrt. to [2]) is a reorder
> operation.
>
> Furthermore I think the notion of the JSON path used in the operations
> should be defined somewhere.
> ...

That's defined in 
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pbryan-zyp-json-pointer-02>...

As an XML person, seeing an XPath-like syntax make me happy. But 
wouldn't be "dot" notation be much simpler, given where JSO comes from?

Best regards, Julian