IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-authres-spf-erratum-00.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Tue, 03 January 2012 23:59 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15A91F0C5D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:59:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.518
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.518 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.081, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BDwBoukMc5P5 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:59:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E651F0C50 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:59:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spite.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.72) by EXCH-HTCAS901.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:58:55 -0800
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.72]) with mapi; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:59:00 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:58:59 -0800
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-authres-spf-erratum-00.txt
Thread-Index: AczKbhKf0ayHWLVWS8+HGnlvsCz8RwABXvlw
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C156E3@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C156DF@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120103145134.099ad970@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120103145134.099ad970@resistor.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-authres-spf-erratum-00.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:59:01 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of SM
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 3:12 PM
> To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-authres-
> spf-erratum-00.txt
> 
> May I suggest that you consider a few points:
> 
>   1. If this work is dependent upon 4408bis, the author has an
> incentive to see
>      4408bis published. :-)

It is not dependent on 4408bis.  The update is correct whether or not that ever publishes.

>   2. There is an assumption about what 4408bis will conclude.

Where?

>   3. 5451bis will likely be published this year.  The erratum could be folded
>      into it.

There's no 5451bis effort afoot that I know of.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email