IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] draft-saintandre-json-namespaces-00 comments

Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> Wed, 09 November 2011 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mark@coactus.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5B421F8C44 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 07:19:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.144
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.144 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.167, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id weK3MiVLXoYa for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 07:19:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE7A21F8C43 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 07:19:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so2364182iae.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 07:19:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.159.1 with SMTP id j1mr3267265icx.20.1320851973219; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 07:19:33 -0800 (PST)
Sender: mark@coactus.com
Received: by 10.42.165.194 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 07:19:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7797835D-26FA-45E4-B66B-A336666F7AC7@vpnc.org>
References: <4EB923CF.7080600@wp.pl> <566A345F-15CD-473B-8472-11EDF73A3862@vpnc.org> <9D5B00CA-9370-45D6-835B-3C7A1ADFEBBC@mnot.net> <4EB97122.7010206@gmx.de> <D75C8075-C8DF-4AA2-9DFC-CED719A0564E@mnot.net> <4EB98090.5020203@gmx.de> <6A0CCE36-5FBE-48E9-A307-1C59C155D8BB@mnot.net> <4EB981B6.1090003@gmx.de> <CALcoZipiOC4ro_Mhhnu7VRAJdSU_N1AhwPa+0XCppQozWiOf0Q@mail.gmail.com> <7797835D-26FA-45E4-B66B-A336666F7AC7@vpnc.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:19:32 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: _cwViX8lIlNoPSRza4CHVwtZyVs
Message-ID: <CALcoZirT3+JgiW1sLPj0j1BOx_UM8VwPdgMboVdZjCJpKftV-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: apps-discuss Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-saintandre-json-namespaces-00 comments
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:19:38 -0000

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Mark Baker wrote:
>
>> http://json-ld.org
>
>
> I would prefer that the output of this work was much, much simpler than this.

JSON-LD lets the people who need URI-grounded names have them, but at
the same time presents enough of a barrier to discourage those who
don't need them from using them.  The last thing JSON needs is the
simple equivalent of xmlns.

Mark.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email