Re: [apps-discuss] [link-relations] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-00.txt

[Julian Reschke <[e-mail]>]

On 2011-07-15 09:29, Maile Ohye wrote:
> Hi everyone, thanks again for the feedback!
>
> Julian, MAY :) we submit a new draft with the changes discussed in this
> thread?

Hi Maile,

it's your draft, so it's your decision.

Internet Draft submission in theory is closed until 10 days from now - 
in practice it still seems to work.

> ...
> 15. OPEN. J. Reschke:
> o  Be the source URI of a 302, 303, or 307 redirect (Sections 10.3.3,
>      10.3.4, and 10.3.8, respectively, of [RFC2616]).
>
> Maybe "Be the source URI of a temporary redirect, such as..."?
> --response by M. Ohye “Changed to
> Be the source URI of a temporary redirect. Using HTTP, this refers to
> status codes 302, 303, or 307 (Sections 10.3.3, 10.3.4, and 10.3.8,
> respectively, of <xref target="RFC2616"/>).
> Julian, please let me know if you’d like this phased differently.
> ...

Sounds good.

> 16. OPEN. J. Reschke:
> may designate the canonical link relation in HTML as specified in [RFC5988]
> Why do we cite RFC 5988 here? Should this ref HTML?
> --response by M. Ohye “Changed to:
> may designate the canonical link relation in HTML as specified in <xref
> target="RFC1866"/>
> I created this reference, but I couldn’t find an organization or email
> address for Dan Connolly.
> <reference anchor="RFC1866">
> <front>
> <title>Hypertext Markup Language - 2.0</title>
> <author initials="T." surname="Berners-Lee" fullname="T. Berners-Lee">
> <organization>MIT/W3C</organization>
> <address><email>[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]></email></address>
> </author>
> <author initials="D." surname="Connolly" fullname="Dan Connolly">
> </author>
> <date month="November" year="1995"/>
> </front>
> <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="1866"/>
> </reference>
> Julian, should I have done anything differently?
> ...

No, you need to cite W3C's HTML specs nowadays.

Either

<reference anchor='REC-html401-19991224'
            target='http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224'>
   <front>
     <title>HTML 4.01 Specification</title>
     <author fullname='Arnaud Le Hors' surname='Le Hors' initials='A.'/>
     <author fullname='David Raggett' surname='Raggett' initials='D.'/>
     <author fullname='Ian Jacobs' surname='Jacobs' initials='I.'/>
     <date year='1999' month='December' day='24'/>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name='W3C Recommendation' value='REC-html401-19991224'/>
   <annotation>
     Latest version available at
     <eref target='http://www.w3.org/TR/html401'/>.
   </annotation>
</reference>

for HTML4 or

<reference anchor='WD-html5-20110525'
            target='http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110525/'>
   <front>
     <title>HTML5</title>
     <author fullname='Ian Hickson' surname='Hickson' initials='I.'/>
     <date year='2011' month='May' day='25'/>
   </front>
   <seriesInfo name='W3C Working Draft' value='WD-html5-20110525'/>
   <annotation>
     Latest version available at
     <eref target='http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/'/>.
   </annotation>
</reference>

for the latest HTML5 Working Draft (see 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/w3c-references.html>).

(I recommend HTML 4.01 because it's stable and the differences to HTML5 
do not matter here).


 > ...

Best regards, Julian