IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Patch

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 22 November 2011 18:27 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3A021F8C0A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:27:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.031
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.031 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.432, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fwgNO0+hnEiy for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:27:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EAC1321F8C00 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:27:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2011 18:27:46 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp023) with SMTP; 22 Nov 2011 19:27:46 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/dOOI0aU/dMETCqxsw5tEsgAEwU1UV4KW9lhNeNX PH7u/z0Xnyu5hv
Message-ID: <4ECBE991.9040704@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:27:29 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Paul C. Bryan" <paul.bryan@forgerock.com>
References: <4EB1482E.1040600@adobe.com> <4EB14C2E.8040208@gmx.de> <1320254564.2622.37.camel@neutron> <4EBBA0DD.9020605@gmx.de> <4ECBC843.60900@gmx.de> <1321986297.2091.1.camel@neutron>
In-Reply-To: <1321986297.2091.1.camel@neutron>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Patch
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:27:52 -0000

On 2011-11-22 19:24, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
> Looks good to me. I don't think "end" is needed, as the end index can be
> explicitly specified.
> ...

It might make it easier to move something to the end when you don't know 
the whole array (for instance, because there may be race conditions)... 
Not sure how important that is for this use case, though...

Best regards, Julian

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status