Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset-01.txt
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 11 April 2012 16:34 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0208221F858E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.386
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.386 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.787, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dDfDw0O3l8Ch for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D7AF921F84F3 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2012 16:34:53 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp069) with SMTP; 11 Apr 2012 18:34:53 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX187orpyMIg7zp1PupT7v3FFx+HLFApDN4FQUX80jJ nOFQQu7/8jI28N
Message-ID: <4F85B2AD.9040801@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:34:53 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
References: <20120330125228.15497.35035.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1271382236.20120330141948@pobox.com> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D06A902EEB4@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <01ODS3YTKX1400ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com> <4F8438C8.2070506@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4F8438C8.2070506@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: Apps-Discusssion <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, Bill McQuillan <McQuilWP@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:34:56 -0000
On 2012-04-10 15:42, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-04-01 06:44, Ned Freed wrote: >> >>> RFC 2397 defaults media type of "data:" URIs to >>> text/plain;charset=US-ASCII. >> >>> Should this be updated to default to utf8? >> >> I'm not entirely sure of all the ramifications, but they are minimal this >> sound like a really good idea to me. > > There is one (IMHO) important erratum for 2397, and also it should be > updated to be based on RFC 3986. > > With respect to the encoding default, it would make sense to check what > current implementations do; if they indeed agree on UTF-8, it might make > sense to make that modification. (Does anybody happen to have a test case?) > ... <http://greenbytes.de/tech/tc/datauri/#defaultencoding1> So it appears that those UAs that do support text/plain data URIs all default to ISO-8859-1. Specifying UTF-8 instead probably wouldn't be helpful. Best regards, Julian
- [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-mim… internet-drafts
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Bill McQuillan
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Larry Masinter
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Bill McQuillan
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Julian Reschke