IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question

Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Mon, 02 July 2012 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4B021F85F1 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 08:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.471
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.471 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.472, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_44=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJMfRqLQ25Rn for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 08:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (am1ehsobe006.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.209]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD3021F8582 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 08:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail37-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.247) by AM1EHSOBE008.bigfish.com (10.3.204.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:53:06 +0000
Received: from mail37-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail37-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EA94C03C1; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:53:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -29
X-BigFish: VS-29(zzbb2dI98dI9371I542M1432Izz1202hzz1033ILz2fh2a8h668h839h93fhd25hf0ah)
Received-SPF: pass (mail37-am1: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=Michael.Jones@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
Received: from mail37-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail37-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1341244384596342_1744; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:53:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from AM1EHSMHS008.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.248]) by mail37-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF6F480046; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:53:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by AM1EHSMHS008.bigfish.com (10.3.207.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:53:03 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.2.53]) by TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.7.153]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.003; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:54:58 +0000
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question
Thread-Index: Ac0367W7uVNJxgK+Tf6qpowkmE64wgbqGMQAAAKM2jAAA8N6gAAAR9EQAD2/6AAAFom7AAAHs0aAAAwDwAAAehjTgAAaLHSAAA1sgoAAHRPgAAADV3qAAABjFwAABDGhgAAACndAAABPPoAAAAa+kA==
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:54:57 +0000
Message-ID: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B1680429673943665729B6@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392812B6B6@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366568E4F@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <1340723227.60315.YahooMailNeo@web31801.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366568FF8@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <043201cd54a5$79f2e170$6dd8a450$@packetizer.com> <CAKaEYhL0NS=RZXTdyOMBM_q15P7D1KZ9kgUyMYYB06kA9f0w8Q@mail.gmail.com> <4FEC3B4F.80607@ninebynine.org> <4FEC8BF0.6070605@stpeter.im> <4FEFBF51.5000905@stpeter.im> <1341157111.65669.YahooMailNeo@web31805.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4FF0C90D.2060207@stpeter.im> <4FF18C30.2040902@ninebynine.org> <CAMm+LwgVKKHOTMnzLAnxvXFjb=F+e5acdk12fO5Nj-DjUq5uHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKaEYhJdbYN4O3GbBYw=mxe3GBL8q51w3YnkR2Y4=1Tn0ztCOA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgazJL2rQjNhnGHgw3kYnR21--RzZ6pWVG5YjVabogRKQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366572961@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <4FF1C3B5.4090902@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4FF1C3B5.4090902@stpeter.im>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.37]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Cc: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:55:03 -0000

It's done a lot - it's one of the primary applications of the "localhost" name.  I suppose we could define acct:user@localhost, but that seems like more of a hack than just allowing acct:user.

				-- Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im] 
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 8:52 AM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker; Melvin Carvalho; Graham Klyne; apps-discuss@ietf.org; Murray S. Kucherawy
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question

On 7/2/12 9:44 AM, Mike Jones wrote:
> +1
> 
> There are plenty of contexts, especially for non-Internet connect 
> systems (yes, these still exist :-) ) where account identifiers are 
> strictly local.  The domain portion of the acct: identifier should be 
> optional.

Be that as it may, do you expect to use URIs to identify systems that are not connected to the Internet?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email