[apps-discuss] Fwd: RFC 6449 on Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 17 November 2011 06:16 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8052A21F979A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:16:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.956
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.956 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.643, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LtBNS5g9BCQM for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:16:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB08621F9799 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:16:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-2121.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-2121.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.33.33]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAH6GFrj097210 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:16:17 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:16:17 +0800
References: <20111117045856.117E6B1E003@rfc-editor.org>
To: apps-discuss Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <B2896927-475F-41A7-8D87-336B672A4D9B@vpnc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Subject: [apps-discuss] Fwd: RFC 6449 on Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:16:18 -0000
Of interest to folks here... Begin forwarded message: > From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > Subject: RFC 6449 on Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations > Date: November 17, 2011 12:58:54 PM GMT+08:00 > To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org > Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > > > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > > RFC 6449 > > Title: Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations > Author: J. Falk, Ed. > Status: Informational > Stream: IETF > Date: November 2011 > Mailbox: ietf@cybernothing.org > Pages: 31 > Characters: 75139 > Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None > > I-D Tag: draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfblbcp-03.txt > > URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6449.txt > > Complaint Feedback Loops similar to those described herein have > existed for more than a decade, resulting in many de facto standards > and best practices. This document is an attempt to codify, and thus > clarify, the ways that both providers and consumers of these feedback > mechanisms intend to use the feedback, describing some already common > industry practices. > > This document is the result of cooperative efforts within the > Messaging Anti-Abuse Working Group, a trade organization separate > from the IETF. The original MAAWG document upon which this document > is based was published in April, 2010. This document does not > represent the consensus of the IETF; rather it is being published as > an Informational RFC to make it widely available to the Internet > community and simplify reference to this material from IETF work. > This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is > published for informational purposes. > > > INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. > It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of > this memo is unlimited.
- [apps-discuss] Fwd: RFC 6449 on Complaint Feedbac… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: RFC 6449 on Complaint Fee… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: RFC 6449 on Complaint Fee… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: RFC 6449 on Complaint Fee… Murray S. Kucherawy