Re: [apps-discuss] Processing draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate via APPSAWG

Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> Wed, 22 May 2013 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <cyrus@daboo.name>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D97221F9409 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 May 2013 07:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.698, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DDd7GFFA0VW7 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 May 2013 07:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from daboo.name (daboo.name [173.13.55.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A74021F9227 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 May 2013 07:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22CD43D3DD9; Wed, 22 May 2013 10:14:05 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
Received: from daboo.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (daboo.name [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 055Me878pM1Z; Wed, 22 May 2013 10:14:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from caldav.corp.apple.com (unknown [17.45.162.46]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 998F943D3DCD; Wed, 22 May 2013 10:14:04 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 10:14:30 -0400
From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <33A64D70C0880C037339D8F8@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwb26e4QCaN9SJC3QSUK9M89mkxXY4r7sDyS6KtMMGXXhw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwb26e4QCaN9SJC3QSUK9M89mkxXY4r7sDyS6KtMMGXXhw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a3 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline; size=1094
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Processing draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate via APPSAWG
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 14:14:12 -0000

Hi Murray,

--On May 7, 2013 at 3:24:30 PM -0700 "Murray S. Kucherawy" 
<superuser@gmail.com> wrote:

> We have received a request to process the above draft through APPSAWG,
> since there is no longer a sieve WG.  It is a relatively short document
> and appears to fall within our charter.
>
> We haven't processed a sieve extension here yet; rather, they've gone
> through small, tight WGs so far.  Before issuing a formal call for
> adoption, I'd like to gauge whether we have enough sieve-aware people
> currently following APPSAWG to be able to contribute reviews and
> constructive commentary.  A virtual show of hands, please?
>

Somewhat late, but I support AppsDiscuss processing this document. It has 
already had some significant review on the ietf-sieve mailing list and is 
probably ready to go straight to last call. Most of the key sieve 
implementors are subscribed to ietf-sieve so any apps-discuss 
"announcements" should be cc'd there as well. Or would it make sense to use 
ietf-sieve as the "primary" mailing list and cc announcements to 
apps-discuss?

-- 
Cyrus Daboo