Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LCI -02
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Mon, 04 June 2012 08:11 UTC
Return-Path: <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6580321F8777 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 01:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.795
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-4.205, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DK=1.009]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y230TZmzmNbC for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 01:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D549D21F8764 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 01:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.61.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4CF1407D; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 08:11:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q548BYfO020394; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 08:11:34 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:08:51 +0200." <4FCC6D13.9020106@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:11:34 +0000
Message-ID: <20393.1338797494@critter.freebsd.dk>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:02:24 -0700
Cc: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Mike Kelly <mike@stateless.co>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LCI -02
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:11:43 -0000
In message <4FCC6D13.9020106@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes: >Here's another question: the proposal defines both a cache directive and >link relations. Have you considered putting all the link-related >information into a cache directive as well? (Not saying it should be the >case but wondering whether that would keep things together that belong >together). I think that will wastly increase the chances that people understand how to use it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
- [apps-discuss] FYI: LCI -02 Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LCI -02 Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LCI -02 Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LCI -02 Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LCI -02 Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LCI -02 Poul-Henning Kamp