IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication of this document"

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Fri, 13 May 2011 05:14 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4DEEE06C7 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.233
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.256, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3UVsg-ND-WMG for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (mailbigip.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45885E06C0 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B7D77805B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= cryptonector.com; b=u2FYcIRHKvOH4qRli9qtzI28175c0bmuBaq+fQkeK/Bl XnXyEPjdKJCUpXt0CdbMuBGuaqnyygVWv3QnjjK14i1onhs/MHD8O9ltyaNhQxOr eSrFyWYcTMcVVbqumr6v653PUvwbTfaD2C7sVhd4qWmiCM+0rJVaiGa+KhfivbI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= cryptonector.com; bh=7iKEXfCe3Jun56jcDyRYG179fCE=; b=jCOzXNqp/XX kYTaRIwkDi5avvhDaGQ/gDks/o9Ki9aXucDqvIb8imW3uksjngbJLMEsARF7TzLv WPVdAiJm61oZnFD+6jc5ncZOHhKbTRFA1OAvMDM7H6phaAA0s/S4FFynI4aLBbzx tv7yQlQbVJB547ccHKbTxSJuZgxiDTns=
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8177778057 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vxg33 with SMTP id 33so1904310vxg.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.73.170 with SMTP id m10mr750441vdv.160.1305263657151; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.155.4 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <A3E2E71B-11AE-479E-A622-FFC265CBF237@afilias.info>
References: <4DC88255.3070403@qualcomm.com> <4DC94F74.30905@dcrocker.net> <4DC9688B.3070701@qualcomm.com> <BANLkTi=cufk36YT+e1GsTjhkR+j-vd4O4A@mail.gmail.com> <4DC9A557.9040504@qualcomm.com> <4DCAFB2A.8030408@dcrocker.net> <BANLkTik4BQdcgdWSgTK7K3R1ksnhm0imJA@mail.gmail.com> <4DCC0257.1050705@dcrocker.net> <BANLkTim4aX4RmaKMTqAk6qmrmSVh9Mc5Uw@mail.gmail.com> <4DCC19A8.3070807@dcrocker.net> <BANLkTik-go7b_MQZFBH0cExasF0ujXD-Dg@mail.gmail.com> <A3E2E71B-11AE-479E-A622-FFC265CBF237@afilias.info>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 00:14:17 -0500
Message-ID: <BANLkTikFhxF=fb1NMEiGbviVSft+Yo9eTg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication of this document"
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 05:14:18 -0000

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info> wrote:
>> Can we get a clear statement as to what's being proposed?  If I
>> misread it, either I'm a poor reader or the proposal is not clear.
>>
>> Nico
>> --
>
> Personal guess is ADs hope to see expanded review beyond "read and support", with reason of why we support.  I assume that no strict format at the beginning (try and evaluate first), otherwise we (as reviewers) might just provide a longer form of "read and support" statement.

That's what I thought, and I agree with that.  Dave seemed to want to
go much further, but I wasn't sure whether a far-reaching proposal had
been made.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email