IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-ietf-enum-iax-10

SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sat, 16 April 2011 02:08 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DEB4E0690 for <apps-review@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AK78f7LWxHwI for <apps-review@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0F1E061E for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from subman.elandsys.com ([41.136.236.164]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3G27QBq013957; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:07:31 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1302919655; bh=gQIE+wgSZBZgMRJY12ZeL+LCzCI=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=3h6B1zmoSYIsQO8oQhSwb/YmR7ttJ+HAKmSLxd9UG2QTucWVlKQL9dMlTJgBIlJK2 9q1T8B49dEiSukYyhDUPNuNHbqDRvyXMkvblvgqFreSrSotxDYu1g1ni5BSgKkHw7u aRYnU2xn3d1gsTIUNSnD02jFvG805pWUpPZVUxhc=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20110415184809.04c7edd0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:05:07 -0700
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
From: SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DA8F094.9030301@stpeter.im>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20110415160801.04f31c40@elandnews.com> <8F8AA6BD-6AA7-43C3-95DF-32874BC86616@mnot.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20110415173926.066dde38@elandnews.com> <4DA8F094.9030301@stpeter.im>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Joseph Yee <jyee@ca.afilias.info>, apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-ietf-enum-iax-10
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 02:08:03 -0000

Hi Peter,
At 18:27 15-04-2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>Hi SM, I just took a quick look at this document. The registration XML
>for submission to IANA looks correct to me, and consistent with RFC
>6117. I haven't double-checked the NAPTR examples, though.

Thanks.  I didn't noticed anything incorrect when I took a quick look 
at the document a few days ago.

Best regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email