Re: [apps-review] Apps Area review Team status

Joe Hildebrand <joe.hildebrand@webex.com> Thu, 31 March 2011 05:49 UTC

Return-Path: <Joe.Hildebrand@webex.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A8F28C1D3 for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.443
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.443 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.089, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8rSisJsctcwd for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw2.webex.com (gw2.webex.com [64.68.122.209]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9899028C1DD for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SRV-EXSC03.webex.local ([192.168.252.197]) by gw2.webex.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:47:36 -0700
Received: from 66.114.169.8 ([66.114.169.8]) by SRV-EXSC03.webex.local ([192.168.252.200]) via Exchange Front-End Server mailus.webex.com ([66.114.175.12]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:47:35 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:47:36 +0200
From: Joe Hildebrand <joe.hildebrand@webex.com>
To: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>, SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, apps-review@ietf.org
Message-ID: <C9B9E218.50EA3%joe.hildebrand@webex.com>
Thread-Topic: [apps-review] Apps Area review Team status
Thread-Index: AcvvZyMdwrM9T6BeDk6F1WO+9TlvXw==
In-Reply-To: <1197A97D01E7D323DD2D0411@PST.JCK.COM>
IM-ID: xmpp:jhildebr@cisco.com
Presence-ID: xmpp:jhildebr@cisco.com
Jabber-ID: jhildebr@cisco.com
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Mar 2011 05:47:36.0124 (UTC) FILETIME=[233077C0:01CBEF67]
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Apps Area review Team status
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:51:55 -0000

On 3/31/11 6:33 AM, "John C Klensin" <klensin@jck.com> wrote:

> There has been a lot of theorizing about how much time the RSOC
> will take.  I think one fairly safe answer is "less after we get
> an RSE selected, hired, and settled in than before that", but
> that is not a quantitative answer.   We ill have to see.

I'm hoping there's also a burst of activity required to deal with RFC
formats.  I'm still trying to wait patiently for "spring" to have that
conversation.

-- 
Joe Hildebrand