Re: [apps-review] Apps review team review request template

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Sat, 24 September 2011 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2105A21F8B20 for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.536
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.536 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.063, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VMPc5qhbk8UJ for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C6B21F8A64 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [188.28.106.38] (188.28.106.38.threembb.co.uk [188.28.106.38]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <Tn3zCAAvpSNB@rufus.isode.com>; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:11:05 +0100
Message-ID: <4E7DF303.5000109@isode.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:10:59 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <CALaySJ+xdPc-oi7BHisgnFcJ-LffyU=YCyv1rn6Zcarf_biXBQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+xdPc-oi7BHisgnFcJ-LffyU=YCyv1rn6Zcarf_biXBQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Apps review team review request template
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:08:30 -0000

Barry Leiba wrote:

>Hi, SM.
>Seeing how many reviewers post their reviews to apps-review prompts me
>to suggest a change to the up-front paragraph of your review request
>template.  I suggest this (example taken from a recent review
>request):
>
>--------------------------------------------------
>OLD
>Pete requested a review of draft-ietf-p2psip-base-18.  The review has
>been assigned to you and is due before September 4.
>
>NEW
>Pete requested a review of draft-ietf-p2psip-base-18.  The review has
>been assigned to you and is due before September 4.  Please post your
>review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT post it to apps-review.
>--------------------------------------------------
>OLD
>The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the authors, the IESG, the
>WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.
>
>NEW
>The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the
>WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the tools
>alias draft-ietf-p2psip-base.all@tools.ietf.org to cover the authors,
>chairs, and shepherd.  If your review recommends significant changes
>to a working-group document, you should also consider copying the
>working group's mailing list.
>
>Suggested distribution:
>   To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-p2psip-base.all@tools.ietf.org
>   cc: iesg@ietf.org
>--------------------------------------------------
>
>
>I think that makes it easier for the reviewers to get it right, and
>not all the reviewers know how to use the tools aliases, so I think
>this will help.  Want to try it?
>  
>
This make sense.

>I would also update the wiki, but I can't see how to (can you tell
>me?).  If you want to, here's my suggestion for
>http://www.apps.ietf.org/content/apps-review-template
>
>--------------------------------------------------
>OLD
>This page provides a template for reviews provided by members of the
>Apps-Review Team.
>Reviewers: Please send all reviews to the apps-discuss list and make
>sure to cc the author(s) of the specification you are reviewing! You
>might also want to check out some samples, such as the reviews of
>draft-wahl-ldap-p3p, draft-ietf-btns-c-api,
>draft-ietf-calsify-2446bis, draft-merrick-jms-uri, and
>draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.
>
>NEW
>This page provides a template for reviews provided by members of the
>Apps-Review Team.
>
>Reviewers: Please send all reviews to the apps-discuss list
>([bold]not[/bold] to the apps-review list), and to the ".all" tools
>alias for the specification you are reviewing (see below)!  In cases
>where your review recommends significant changes to a working-group
>document, you should also consider copying the working group's mailing
>list.
>
>You might also want to check out some samples, such as the reviews of
>draft-wahl-ldap-p3p, draft-ietf-btns-c-api,
>draft-ietf-calsify-2446bis, draft-merrick-jms-uri, and
>draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.
>
>Suggested distribution list for reviews:
>   To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-name-without-version-num.all@tools.ietf.org
>   cc: iesg@ietf.org
>--------------------------------------------------
>
>Barry
>