Re: [apps-review] Apps review team review request template

[Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>]

Barry Leiba wrote:

>Hi, SM.
>Seeing how many reviewers post their reviews to apps-review prompts me
>to suggest a change to the up-front paragraph of your review request
>template.  I suggest this (example taken from a recent review
>request):
>
>--------------------------------------------------
>OLD
>Pete requested a review of draft-ietf-p2psip-base-18.  The review has
>been assigned to you and is due before September 4.
>
>NEW
>Pete requested a review of draft-ietf-p2psip-base-18.  The review has
>been assigned to you and is due before September 4.  Please post your
>review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT post it to apps-review.
>--------------------------------------------------
>OLD
>The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the authors, the IESG, the
>WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.
>
>NEW
>The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the
>WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the tools
>alias [e-mail] to cover the authors,
>chairs, and shepherd.  If your review recommends significant changes
>to a working-group document, you should also consider copying the
>working group's mailing list.
>
>Suggested distribution:
>   To: [e-mail], [e-mail]
>   cc: [e-mail]
>--------------------------------------------------
>
>
>I think that makes it easier for the reviewers to get it right, and
>not all the reviewers know how to use the tools aliases, so I think
>this will help.  Want to try it?
>  
>
This make sense.

>I would also update the wiki, but I can't see how to (can you tell
>me?).  If you want to, here's my suggestion for
>http://www.apps.ietf.org/content/apps-review-template
>
>--------------------------------------------------
>OLD
>This page provides a template for reviews provided by members of the
>Apps-Review Team.
>Reviewers: Please send all reviews to the apps-discuss list and make
>sure to cc the author(s) of the specification you are reviewing! You
>might also want to check out some samples, such as the reviews of
>draft-wahl-ldap-p3p, draft-ietf-btns-c-api,
>draft-ietf-calsify-2446bis, draft-merrick-jms-uri, and
>draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.
>
>NEW
>This page provides a template for reviews provided by members of the
>Apps-Review Team.
>
>Reviewers: Please send all reviews to the apps-discuss list
>([bold]not[/bold] to the apps-review list), and to the ".all" tools
>alias for the specification you are reviewing (see below)!  In cases
>where your review recommends significant changes to a working-group
>document, you should also consider copying the working group's mailing
>list.
>
>You might also want to check out some samples, such as the reviews of
>draft-wahl-ldap-p3p, draft-ietf-btns-c-api,
>draft-ietf-calsify-2446bis, draft-merrick-jms-uri, and
>draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.
>
>Suggested distribution list for reviews:
>   To: [e-mail], [e-mail]
>   cc: [e-mail]
>--------------------------------------------------
>
>Barry
>