Re: [apps-review] [v6ops] Review of: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-03 *(formal for apps area)*

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 31 May 2011 06:48 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A51E07BD for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7PPOPInUylBY for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.44.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB3DE07D7 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kpbe20.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe20.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.84]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p4V6mQWp023951 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:48:27 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1306824507; bh=FrzuBnQOmnqgYtanwRJny9rAWyA=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=ZVaYv33OPhS1ius2dgNhGuZJGxvim8WMMWcpSg/m4PvNHOqd3hinwFkwtUgZaPSJO N6mB6xWSkp1Y48KrTuuCg==
Received: from yxa15 (yxa15.prod.google.com [10.190.1.15]) by kpbe20.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p4V6mPnX017702 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:48:25 -0700
Received: by yxa15 with SMTP id 15so1713114yxa.9 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=MhH8+2cFafGleUo/wv6dxT+9tWBqPoMXgBW3PhkPITw=; b=M5Ob57nm9DGFHmQ9QEI5wMoblW2QjZr9DtOTG8154qYSEfhAHIFKep+TzCFqyQTwuA OO5izU6OLzZz/KiJP+1A==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=iPDKcWdPjEh2O0wp/mzj/mF+ntEcs6ZMi/qIpIMbgbiM9Be6RIM3fc0Ijhw+YPpLUn w5ymAJbedRbKrtH5cU/w==
Received: by 10.150.113.20 with SMTP id l20mr4609357ybc.36.1306824505169; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.101.5 with HTTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7006BAA9-E515-42E7-85E2-06E1263CAD0E@bogus.com>
References: <CA084387.289FF%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com> <4DE3B8FD.7040209@dcrocker.net> <20110530154841.GM45955@Space.Net> <BANLkTik4XTeWDXr5OQ+i5PxjOaSehwfx3smE_p+W783Hqw4-yQ@mail.gmail.com> <7006BAA9-E515-42E7-85E2-06E1263CAD0E@bogus.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 23:48:04 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=s_WHKnGzf=azS41m9tvnR4FJ16DevD4jOqwEwf09iJQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd568306a19da04a48cca65
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 31 May 2011 08:09:25 -0700
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, Apps Review <apps-review@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-review] [v6ops] Review of: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-03 *(formal for apps area)*
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 06:48:28 -0000

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote:

> But you've contributed to this document, so have others from that list.
>

I don't want to contribute to the document because - in my opinion, and
speaking only for myself - I don't think it can be made into a balanced
assessment of the issue without major changes.

Since a) I don't have even a fraction of the time I would need to actually
contribute said changes, b) the document is already in an advanced state of
the IETF process, and c) it doesn't matter so much what the document ends up
saying, because most of the organizations for whom this is an issue have
already looked at the data and recognized that they have no alternative, I
was simply steering clear of the document entirely.

It's true that I have pointed out things I think are incorrect. But I did
not view these as contributions, more as offering occasional token
opposition lest silence be interpreted as assent. :-) But perhaps you're
right and I should not comment on it at all.

Cheers,
Lorenzo