IETF Logo Mail Archive

[apps-review] draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis

Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com> Wed, 21 September 2011 23:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2E71F0D22 for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <NXw340CxxKnd>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.886
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.886 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.713, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NXw340CxxKnd for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4971F0D21 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=rg+ietf@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1316646167; x=1348182167; h=message-id:x-mailer:date:to:from:subject:content-type: x-random-sig-tag; z=Message-Id:=20<p06240604caa018bc2b46@loud.pensive.org> |X-Mailer:=20Eudora=20for=20Mac=20OS=20X|Date:=20Wed,=202 1=20Sep=202011=2015:57:47=20-0700|To:=20apps-review@ietf. org,=20Murray=20Kucherawy=20<msk@cloudmark.com>,=0D=0A=20 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20Barry=20Leiba=20<barryleiba@gmail.co m>|From:=20Randall=20Gellens=20<rg+ietf@qualcomm.com> |Subject:=20draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis|Content-Type: =20text/plain=3B=20charset=3D"us-ascii"=20=3B=20format=3D "flowed"|X-Random-Sig-Tag:=201.0b28; bh=Z83oxKangU1uOvoQ+hhcFnZwrZY7vj9PVz3wHHe4TKU=; b=ux2B6NFle7yHYoYoHhnEo2XzfsdSfjOVi4sT61Gbqd43qT/n965a/wr+ dFqeWUS75XMUBN0lnE1UAI1rgwvSyse2U5ChzBpukwD0Dl+ZiA3Hsm5Tv oWrankcNACDFHlVQywKk9Cyb+S+oxXtO35yN85OpV4Z2ovpOuDG9kkRr3 0=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6476"; a="120527460"
Received: from ironmsg04-l.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.19]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 21 Sep 2011 16:02:46 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,417,1312182000"; d="scan'208";a="74799087"
Received: from warlock.qualcomm.com ([129.46.50.49]) by Ironmsg04-L.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Sep 2011 16:02:46 -0700
Received: from loud.pensive.org (myvpn-l-00709.ras.qualcomm.com [10.64.136.131]) by warlock.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id p8LN2iIg005986; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:02:45 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240604caa018bc2b46@loud.pensive.org>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:57:47 -0700
To: apps-review@ietf.org, Murray Kucherawy <msk@cloudmark.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@gmail.com>
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:43:01 -0700
Subject: [apps-review] draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:00:17 -0000

This document looks good.

One minor request:

In Section 4, under "Encoding considerations", I'd recommend either 
deleting "are broken" or adding "or extended".  (In my view, this 
makes it easier for EAI.)

OLD:
       Encoding considerations:  7-bit is sufficient for normal mail
       headers, however, if the headers are broken and require encoding

NEW:
       Encoding considerations:  7-bit is sufficient for normal mail
       headers, however, if the headers require encoding

OR:
       Encoding considerations:  7-bit is sufficient for normal mail
       headers, however, if the headers are broken or extended
       and require encoding

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
Vous etes ici

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email