IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-review] Directorate

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sat, 24 September 2011 03:07 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B22C21F869E for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.024
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.024 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.007, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lToOm0ELDd39 for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D3C21F8511 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyd12 with SMTP id 12so3677803gyd.31 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=j+U9lieEXblVCWwFtcnWv1kTJlqlhj2gp5E0Tgadi9I=; b=pvj0dh02PDWUEF5FFV69z1cbBi96Ztr16ClWMpHuwRaofZJoKzU6998QFyAxeGvQEl 5G7eM0RuZsu3LjDcAjZvvKnCtceV+WsOw1PaSzXHgZ7XDBkq5zmwF9tFy61hf+3M9hW+ b+RnlqWYT/elxQVs6tVdu7S4u8iBbyNGVn+mM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.187.36 with SMTP id x24mr25746158yhm.74.1316833779902; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.146.83.8 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110923145427.09b6c3b0@elandnews.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20110923145427.09b6c3b0@elandnews.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:09:39 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: n2zJGWt3r1HI_5gQduVvoX1JhE0
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVBGp=hmqGFP04v2dWx99fQsWDvvHbpNkdNf+fsJCvRN9A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Directorate
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 03:07:04 -0000

> Most IETF areas have a directorate.  In the Applications Area, there are the
> LDAP and XML Directorates.  The only two review teams are Gen-ART and this
> team.  I welcome your advice on whether it would be better if the review
> team is turned into a directorate.

I see no reason not to formally change it to a directorate.  Sounds good to me.

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email