[apps-review] Apps review team review request template

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Fri, 23 September 2011 15:16 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038DE21F8CC6 for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.005
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mCroltdKj1gw for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E65F21F8CA7 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yxt33 with SMTP id 33so3377775yxt.31 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9hcvcgMEwnFAh/0GPVUlrKl1r0nQEHK/5E7qTZ9uZjk=; b=vzs2IeFMclgRFP4rAGiYYEjTKtjKG6WTxxCqek3WfjY4dV1oZ6Jn9tyIVOYXUJudLp BojHyAzDDGNypDrejCXfkCs9Tsn9Ox9e19z6YXCSiNrzJwL952JkGHBV4r5PiYGIjzHU DGnu8Dc1r5HBQt7sh3C3miw1795bDRNnKRU44=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.152.8 with SMTP id c8mr22283449yhk.107.1316791138453; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.236.203.68 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:18:58 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: iWGLs381ctUHWGQCmzL2Oq05-w4
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+xdPc-oi7BHisgnFcJ-LffyU=YCyv1rn6Zcarf_biXBQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: [apps-review] Apps review team review request template
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:16:25 -0000

Hi, SM.
Seeing how many reviewers post their reviews to apps-review prompts me
to suggest a change to the up-front paragraph of your review request
template.  I suggest this (example taken from a recent review
request):

--------------------------------------------------
OLD
Pete requested a review of draft-ietf-p2psip-base-18.  The review has
been assigned to you and is due before September 4.

NEW
Pete requested a review of draft-ietf-p2psip-base-18.  The review has
been assigned to you and is due before September 4.  Please post your
review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT post it to apps-review.
--------------------------------------------------
OLD
The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the authors, the IESG, the
WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.

NEW
The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the
WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the tools
alias draft-ietf-p2psip-base.all@tools.ietf.org to cover the authors,
chairs, and shepherd.  If your review recommends significant changes
to a working-group document, you should also consider copying the
working group's mailing list.

Suggested distribution:
   To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-p2psip-base.all@tools.ietf.org
   cc: iesg@ietf.org
--------------------------------------------------


I think that makes it easier for the reviewers to get it right, and
not all the reviewers know how to use the tools aliases, so I think
this will help.  Want to try it?

I would also update the wiki, but I can't see how to (can you tell
me?).  If you want to, here's my suggestion for
http://www.apps.ietf.org/content/apps-review-template

--------------------------------------------------
OLD
This page provides a template for reviews provided by members of the
Apps-Review Team.
Reviewers: Please send all reviews to the apps-discuss list and make
sure to cc the author(s) of the specification you are reviewing! You
might also want to check out some samples, such as the reviews of
draft-wahl-ldap-p3p, draft-ietf-btns-c-api,
draft-ietf-calsify-2446bis, draft-merrick-jms-uri, and
draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.

NEW
This page provides a template for reviews provided by members of the
Apps-Review Team.

Reviewers: Please send all reviews to the apps-discuss list
([bold]not[/bold] to the apps-review list), and to the ".all" tools
alias for the specification you are reviewing (see below)!  In cases
where your review recommends significant changes to a working-group
document, you should also consider copying the working group's mailing
list.

You might also want to check out some samples, such as the reviews of
draft-wahl-ldap-p3p, draft-ietf-btns-c-api,
draft-ietf-calsify-2446bis, draft-merrick-jms-uri, and
draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.

Suggested distribution list for reviews:
   To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-name-without-version-num.all@tools.ietf.org
   cc: iesg@ietf.org
--------------------------------------------------

Barry