Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-ietf-p2psip-base

SM <> Tue, 16 August 2011 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF21221F8C19 for <>; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 02:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.66
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.66 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.061, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0dr52PqKw4L1 for <>; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 02:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC0721F8BA9 for <>; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 02:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7G9GxIS004898; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 02:17:05 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1313486226; bh=RcuL0C2FvXl8TJMeXHHf3O+NO54=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=bU2/Et9A2pXw66zuqIwHngAogzdn3iOOW5Nf8rj2majxx35eUFmOaauEcLagDiUDL i3bjtJW5sbkvFye63qL9WthQRg0fJkPr53jE2azUgDHM52QY3/HjM+uqkPJkWTSMMD nYRJ7MLyRCWQDhf+HjQV3VOFhtuzKKR0Zxtyc6Is=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 02:16:57 -0700
To: Enrico Marocco <>
From: SM <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-ietf-p2psip-base
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:16:21 -0000

Hi Enricco,

Pete requested a review of draft-ietf-p2psip-base-18.  As I haven't 
received any response about the assignment, I am reassigning the 
review to you.  The review is due before September 4.

You can find information about the author and WG in the datatracker ( ).  Some 
previous reviews from the Apps-review Team are accessible at

The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the authors, the IESG, the 
WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.

The subject of the email when submitting the review should be 
"apps-team review of

There is some Relax NG in Section 10.1.1 and a URI scheme in Section 
13.15.  If you need someone else from the team to review that part, 
please let me know.

Best regards,