Re: [apps-review] draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Wed, 21 September 2011 23:21 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C077A11E8073 for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.482
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.117, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PrvImm4k00-X for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18B31F0D31 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:24:17 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>, "apps-review@ietf.org" <apps-review@ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:24:16 -0700
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis
Thread-Index: Acx4spgBBaJK8kL5QoKbNQLiJfi31gAAvKsg
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DFD4D@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <p06240604caa018bc2b46@loud.pensive.org>
In-Reply-To: <p06240604caa018bc2b46@loud.pensive.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [apps-review] draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:21:49 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randall Gellens [mailto:rg+ietf@qualcomm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 3:58 PM
> To: apps-review@ietf.org; Murray S. Kucherawy; Barry Leiba
> Subject: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis
> 
> This document looks good.
> 
> One minor request:
> 
> In Section 4, under "Encoding considerations", I'd recommend either
> deleting "are broken" or adding "or extended".  (In my view, this
> makes it easier for EAI.)
> 
> OLD:
>        Encoding considerations:  7-bit is sufficient for normal mail
>        headers, however, if the headers are broken and require encoding
> 
> NEW:
>        Encoding considerations:  7-bit is sufficient for normal mail
>        headers, however, if the headers require encoding
> 
> OR:
>        Encoding considerations:  7-bit is sufficient for normal mail
>        headers, however, if the headers are broken or extended
>        and require encoding

Went with the latter in my working copy. Thanks!

-MSK