IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11

SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 01 December 2011 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E488121F9427 for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 12:39:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.002, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tChSP0Y1gKW3 for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 12:39:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDAF21F90EB for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 12:39:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.235.174]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB1KdSWE032426; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 12:39:33 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1322771975; bh=jXeQ4H6g3jg98KzXL+WSPuDkknI=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=ckNdvv2OKfR9rq1dYM2aIb8lN0tD/ks6WMJiJ3Roy2WH1+iiG0CHquNZD8UScHIBN MqkVmTjpoMac+SH/Wq1fUoNdmX9HIgxetE2+z42ByQSjsbahoKMw6MMOJzq1zfi3sl QDX77AOFaCg889CN6q0M51wHq2PfJTn39W86kp98=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20111201123232.09bce638@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 12:39:23 -0800
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
From: SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C15364@EXCH-C2.corp.cl oudmark.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20111201073433.0a20a250@elandnews.com> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C15364@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:39:49 -0000

Hi Murray,
At 12:05 01-12-2011, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>I'll do it if he doesn't want it!

If you want to take up the review, I'll ask you to write one which 
argues that the draft is not ready for publication as 
Experimental.  Send it to me off-list and I'll post it to this list 
after the apps review has been completed if the ADs agree not to take 
your review into consideration for the evaluation.

Best regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email