Re: [apps-review] Directorate

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Sat, 24 September 2011 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B073521F8AE6 for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 07:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6JGYFZc-8R0m for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 07:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203D621F8AD8 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 07:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [188.28.106.38] (188.28.106.38.threembb.co.uk [188.28.106.38]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <Tn3j8gAvpcYj@rufus.isode.com>; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:06:45 +0100
Message-ID: <4E7DE3EE.9010507@isode.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:06:38 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20110923145427.09b6c3b0@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110923145427.09b6c3b0@elandnews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Directorate
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:04:10 -0000

SM wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Most IETF areas have a directorate.  In the Applications Area, there 
> are the LDAP and XML Directorates.  The only two review teams are 
> Gen-ART and this team.  I welcome your advice on whether it would be 
> better if the review team is turned into a directorate.  The 
> advantages I can think of are:
>
>  - It helps in your day job.
>
>  - It may influence more reviewers to join the team.
>
>  - I can ask you to do more early reviews. :-)
>
> I have not asked Apps ADs what they think about the idea.

Are we going to get cool T-shirt and can we get expensive dinners covered?