Re: [apps-review] apps-team review of draft-ietf-speechsc-mrcpv2-24
SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 27 April 2011 17:40 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36111E07C7 for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GJSGEY9orLAK for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E10E07AE for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from subman.elandsys.com ([41.136.235.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3RHdq5D010159; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:39:58 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1303926000; bh=JtKWT2jQZkq7h0ADITOiihNLgkM=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=lw1egyjnEcwxaz+1gpu/k8AZ5qSSoR9ZIFRdwWADIj29eLuf4wsSmoIO/V4dehMUa P+CR5aJhjCoNyDobOnGomXp9EmvCMgvUBPRFPiUY3taPOZsbcILupTAEdHKkIZUrP1 Pw9L2O6RndtJ2Bg2JSi7Nu+sV3w9i7tc0mi9oogg=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20110427091204.05694848@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:28:44 -0700
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
From: SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D05A089B783@nambxv01a.corp. adobe.com>
References: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D05A089B718@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110426092800.0304c710@elandnews.com> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D05A089B783@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-review] apps-team review of draft-ietf-speechsc-mrcpv2-24
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:40:06 -0000
Hi Larry, I read your recommendation in the draft review of draft-ietf-speechsc-mrcpv2-24 as "do not publish". I sent an email to Eric Burger who is the document shepherd. I haven't received any reply yet. I don't know what the Apps ADs' stance will be on this document. I can only ask them to read the review and take it into consideration when the document goes through IESG Evaluation. I hope that you will not be discouraged as documents do get published as RFCs even if they get bad reviews. In my opinion, your expertise is put to waste as there are people on the apps-discuss mailing list who will read your review and learn something from it. The following is what I found about draft-ietf-speechsc-mrcpv2: Document shepherd write-up - June 2009 http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/speechsc/current/msg02386.html RAI review - June 2009 http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/speechsc/current/msg02396.html Sec-dir review - July 2010 http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg01853.html In general, I leave it to the author of an Internet-Draft to determine whether a review should be taken as constructive criticism and feedback on how to improve a document or whether it is merely a hurdle to overcome to get that magic RFC number. Best regards, -sm
- Re: [apps-review] apps-team review of draft-ietf-… SM
- Re: [apps-review] apps-team review of draft-ietf-… Larry Masinter
- Re: [apps-review] apps-team review of draft-ietf-… SM
- Re: [apps-review] apps-team review of draft-ietf-… Eric Burger
- [apps-review] apps-team review of draft-ietf-spee… Larry Masinter