IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-review] Fwd: apps-review => appsdir

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Tue, 29 November 2011 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E1411E80EE for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:41:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ktRmZD2+4Ugw for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:41:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA1611E80AE for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:41:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:41:53 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:41:53 -0800
Thread-Topic: [apps-review] Fwd: apps-review => appsdir
Thread-Index: Acyuzl1tU5Iy1bURS12uP2KMZ3YfRgAAHebA
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C152A0@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <4ED52A29.4080604@stpeter.im> <4ED52A4D.5050502@stpeter.im> <6.2.5.6.2.20111129110402.0a550350@elandnews.com> <4ED53474.8050403@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4ED53474.8050403@stpeter.im>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "apps-review@ietf.org" <apps-review@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Fwd: apps-review => appsdir
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:41:57 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: apps-review-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-review-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 11:37 AM
> To: SM
> Cc: apps-review@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [apps-review] Fwd: apps-review => appsdir
> 
> SM, where do we want to store information about the working groups that
> AppsDir members are tracking?

I just added those columns to the table on the directorate page.  We're deciding whether or not we like how it looks.  Have a look; what do you think?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email