IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-review] breakfast notes

SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 16 November 2011 05:44 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4C111E80FC for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:44:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.563
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.036, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DDW3ddDu+95N for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:44:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3154211E80D0 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:44:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sm-THINK.elandsys.com (dhcp-16fb.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.22.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAG5i9nH030216; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:44:13 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1321422254; bh=HOG9i5PMDJxbXV+j1N42zOY/OOI=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=he0A+ZvfDbD/8u5FVKYgB1iczKye28sI71pBFdfvdtTh5aL8DgJxuI3xdyZYkp17h YsyV1wYrn1UhwMb4JdIsvHDIBYrehnldMFzR03WrYV5HFR/wtHe0J2mK1fEZpvmaNs PlZXmVr/6SCEr5dWE5YdYM82d8X8uhJIn9U9GYf8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20111115214101.07cfe2a0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:43:24 -0800
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
From: SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D0611DAC351@nambxv01a.corp. adobe.com>
References: <4EC339C4.1040709@stpeter.im> <CAC4RtVC84HqOKjiarpvQ1mN+KBc3EtPB-ZP+4QRk5sXzCxqrpQ@mail.gmail.com> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D0611DAC351@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-review] breakfast notes
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 05:44:28 -0000

Hi Larry,
At 09:38 PM 11/15/2011, Larry Masinter wrote:
>I was speculating about what the relationship between the Apps 
>directorate and W3C might be, if you kind of think that W3C handles 
>"the web parts of Apps", e.g., recruit more folks from W3C to be in 
>apps-review (although there already are some).

We have a few folks involved in the W3C on the team.  If you know 
anyone who can do reviews for the Apps Area, please ask the person to 
contact me.

Best regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email